From: guorke <gourke@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I confused about diff(simple question)
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 13:42:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d73ab4d0050709224225b2e528@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d73ab4d005070922413fb0dbba@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/10/05, guorke <gourke@gmail.com> wrote:
> like:
>
> /*
> @@ -220,9 +232,8(HERE: why not -220,9 +220,8) @@ fastcall notrace void
> do_page_fault(stru
> struct vm_area_struct * vma;
> unsigned long address;
> unsigned long page;
> - int write;
> - siginfo_t info;
> -
> + int write, si_code;
> +
> /* get the address */
> __asm__("movl %%cr2,%0":"=r" (address));
> trace_special(regs->eip, error_code, address);
> @@ -236,7 +247,7 (HERE: why not -236,7,+236,7) @@ fastcall notrace
> void do_page_fault(stru
>
> tsk = current;
>
> - info.si_code = SEGV_MAPERR;
> + si_code = SEGV_MAPERR;
>
> /*
> * We fault-in kernel-space virtual memory on-demand. The
> @@ -316,7 +327,7 (HERE -316,7, +316,7) @@ fastcall notrace void
> do_page_fault(stru
> * we can handle it..
> */
> good_area:
> - info.si_code = SEGV_ACCERR;
> + si_code = SEGV_ACCERR;
> write = 0;
> switch (error_code & 3) {
> default: /* 3: write, present */
> @@ -390,11 +401,7 (HERE:why not -390,11,+390,11) @@ bad_area_nosemaphore:
> /* Kernel addresses are always protection faults */
> tsk->thread.error_code = error_code | (address >= TASK_SIZE);
> tsk->thread.trap_no = 14;
> - info.si_signo = SIGSEGV;
> - info.si_errno = 0;
> - /* info.si_code has been set above */
> - info.si_addr = (void __user *)address;
> - force_sig_info(SIGSEGV, &info, tsk);
> + force_sig_info_fault(SIGSEGV, si_code, address, tsk);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -500,11 +507,7(HERE: why not -500,11,+500,7) @@ do_sigbus:
> tsk->thread.cr2 = address;
> tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
> tsk->thread.trap_no = 14;
> - info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
> - info.si_errno = 0;
> - info.si_code = BUS_ADRERR;
> - info.si_addr = (void __user *)address;
> - force_sig_info(SIGBUS, &info, tsk);
> + force_sig_info_fault(SIGBUS, BUS_ADRERR, address, tsk);
> return;
>
> ...
>
> in :-220,9 +232,8
> I think the old file from the line 220,and have 9 lines,then the
> newfile have 8 lines
> so must delete one line. but why +232,it from the line 232 ?
> like this..
>
> maybe it's very very simple.but i really confused it.wishes helps,
>
> Thanks
>
> --------
> guorke
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-10 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-10 5:41 guorke
2005-07-10 5:42 ` guorke [this message]
2005-07-10 6:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-07-10 6:13 ` randy_dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d73ab4d0050709224225b2e528@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gourke@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®