From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>
Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: host: pci: introduce PCI vendor ID for Netlogic
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:36:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d755d623-2bb3-460f-45a0-2be6ab6f47ea@skidata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180314104849.GB32615@kroah.com>
On 03/14/2018 11:48 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:29:32AM +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
>> From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
>>
>> Replace the hardcoded PCI vendor ID of Netlogic with a definition in
>> pci_ids.h
>
> Why? It's only being used in one file, so it should not be in
> pci_ids.h, right?
It's also used as PCI_VENDOR_NETLOGIC in arch/mips/netlogic/xlp/.
Should this be replaced with PCI_VENDOR_ID_NETLOGIC from pci_ids.h?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
thank you!
regards;Richard.L
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-14 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 10:29 [PATCH 0/3] usb: host: pci: PCI ID consolidation Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb: host: pci: use existing Intel PCI ID macros Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:48 ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] usb: host: pci: introduce PCI vendor ID for Netlogic Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:48 ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 11:36 ` Richard Leitner [this message]
2018-03-14 11:49 ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 12:17 ` Oliver Neukum
2018-03-14 13:31 ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 15:27 ` Oliver Neukum
2018-03-14 15:44 ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-15 9:26 ` Oliver Neukum
2018-03-15 9:47 ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] usb: host: pci: replace hardcoded renesas PCI IDs Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:49 ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 11:38 ` Richard Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d755d623-2bb3-460f-45a0-2be6ab6f47ea@skidata.com \
--to=richard.leitner@skidata.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dev@g0hl1n.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome