From: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched/psi: Make psi stubs consistent for !CONFIG_PSI
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:52:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d774a762-5787-46db-ac3c-2c8e8b76a9c9@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <892917ec-15b3-4852-b12f-9232e438802f@amd.com>
Hi Prateek,
On 20/11/25 11:40, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Vineeth,
>
> On 11/20/2025 11:29 AM, Madadi Vineeth Reddy wrote:
>> On 18/11/25 00:25, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>>> commit 1a6151017ee5 ("sched: psi: pass enqueue/dequeue flags to psi
>>> callbacks directly") modified the psi_enqueue() and psi_dequeue()
>>> functions to take the complete enqueue/dequeue flags but left the stubs
>>> for !CONFIG_PSI unaltered.
>>>
>>> Modify the stubs to also accept the flags argument to keep it consistent
>>> with CONFIG_PSI.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/sched/stats.h | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/stats.h b/kernel/sched/stats.h
>>> index cbf7206b3f9d..3323d773fec3 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/stats.h
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/stats.h
>>> @@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ static inline void psi_sched_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
>>> }
>>>
>>> #else /* !CONFIG_PSI: */
>>> -static inline void psi_enqueue(struct task_struct *p, bool migrate) {}
>>> -static inline void psi_dequeue(struct task_struct *p, bool migrate) {}
>>> +static inline void psi_enqueue(struct task_struct *p, int flags) {}
>>> +static inline void psi_dequeue(struct task_struct *p, int flags) {}
>>> static inline void psi_ttwu_dequeue(struct task_struct *p) {}
>>> static inline void psi_sched_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
>>> struct task_struct *next,
>>
>> Right. The commit that updated the function signature did not update the
>> !CONFIG_PSI stubs accordingly. This patch corrects that.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> P.S. John has an alternate fix for the same at
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251118055242.4030849-1-jstultz@google.com/
Thanks for pointing this out. While going through the discussion I had seen it
in John's tree, but I hadn't realized it was already posted upstream.
I gave the Reviewed-by since the first two cleanup patches still seem valid
and can go in independently of that alternate fix.
Thanks,
Vineeth
>
> That considers a blocked donor as a runnable entity from PSI
> standpoint.
>
> This series implements the alternate approach of blocking the PSI signals
> when the blocked donor is retained on the rq, skipping the block_task()
> and it enqueues the PSI signal back when the donor is woken up again.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 18:55 [RFC PATCH 0/5] sched/psi: Fix PSI accounting with proxy execution K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-17 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/psi: Make psi stubs consistent for !CONFIG_PSI K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-18 1:06 ` John Stultz
2025-11-20 5:59 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-11-20 6:10 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-20 6:22 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy [this message]
2025-12-02 14:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-11-17 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/psi: Prepend "0x" to format specifiers when printing PSI flags K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-18 1:08 ` John Stultz
2025-12-02 14:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-11-17 18:55 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] sched/core: Track blocked tasks retained on rq for proxy K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-18 4:38 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-17 18:55 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/core: Block proxy task on pick when blocked_on is cleared before wakeup K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-17 18:55 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] sched/psi: Fix PSI signals of blocked tasks retained for proxy K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-18 0:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] sched/psi: Fix PSI accounting with proxy execution John Stultz
2025-11-18 1:38 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-11-18 4:26 ` John Stultz
2025-11-18 5:08 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d774a762-5787-46db-ac3c-2c8e8b76a9c9@linux.ibm.com \
--to=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®