> Mathias ,
> After tracing this it seems to be either one of two things based on
> the warn on messages in
> __queue_work. Normally it would be because of this line.
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());.
> However it would also be the second warn on, If you want I can send a
> simple patch with
> a printk statement to see which one it is.
> Regards Nick
That would be helpful. I can try to see what's happening.

Regards

Mathias
���{.n�+�������+%�����ݶ��w��{.n�+����{��G�����{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h��������z_�(�階�ݢj"���m������G������?����&���~��iO��z��v�^�m����������?�I�