mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com,
	sebastian.reichel@collabora.com
Cc: brgl@bgdev.pl, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com,
	Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Initialize gc->irq.domain before setting gc->to_irq
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 16:26:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7d8bd97-3c12-bf04-a0ad-e0f391158d01@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tugdxkj6.fsf@collabora.com>


On 16/11/21 1:23 am, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Shreeya, all,
>>
>> On 2021/11/09, Shreeya Patel wrote:
>>> There is a race in registering of gc->irq.domain when
>>> probing the I2C driver.
>>> This sometimes leads to a Kernel NULL pointer dereference
>>> in gpiochip_to_irq function which uses the domain variable.
>>>
>>> To avoid this issue, set gc->to_irq after domain is
>>> initialized. This will make sure whenever gpiochip_to_irq
>>> is called, it has domain already initialized.
>>>
>> What is stopping the next developer to moving the assignment to the
>> incorrect place? Aka should we add an inline comment about this?
> I agree with Emil.  The patch seems like a workaround that doesn't
> really solve the underlying issue.  I'm not familiar with this code, but
> it seems that gc is missing a lock during this initialization, to prevent
> it from exposing a partially initialized gc->irq.

I do not see any locking mechanism used for protecting the use of gc 
members before they are
initialized. We faced a very similar problem with gc->to_irq as well 
where we had to return EPROBE_DEFER until it was initialized and ready 
to be used.

Linus, do you have any suggestion on what would be the correct way to 
fix this issue of race in registration of gc members?


Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-25 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-08 21:41 Shreeya Patel
2021-11-09 13:48 ` Emil Velikov
2021-11-15 19:53   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-11-25 10:56     ` Shreeya Patel [this message]
2021-11-26  1:17       ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d7d8bd97-3c12-bf04-a0ad-e0f391158d01@collabora.com \
    --to=shreeya.patel@collabora.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=emil.velikov@collabora.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome