From: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Abdel Alkuor <abdelalkuor@geotab.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:13:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7ec1064-b82c-4721-853a-06b5710fdffa@wolfvision.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zg+fD6w1MykCsEe6@kuha.fi.intel.com>
On 4/5/24 08:49, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:55:29AM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>>>> - ret = tps6598x_read64(tps, TPS_REG_INT_EVENT1, &event1);
>>>> - ret |= tps6598x_read64(tps, TPS_REG_INT_EVENT2, &event2);
>>>> + ret = tps6598x_block_read(tps, TPS_REG_INT_EVENT1, event1, 11);
>>>
>>> This is not going to work with the older TI PD controllers.
>>>
>>> The lenght of these registers is 8 bytes on the older TI PD
>>> controllers (TPS65981, TPS65982, etc.). I think we need to split this
>>> function.
>>>
>>
>> That is a good point. I had a look at the older TI PD controllers and I
>> agree with you that we should split the function to cover both register
>> lengths separately.
>>
>> I was thinking about adding a new compatible for the newer PD
>> controllers (tps65987 and tps65988), keeping the current tps6598x for
>> the older ones as well as backwards compatibility. But backwards
>> compatibility would also mean that flags beyond the first 8 bytes would
>> be ignored.
>>
>> On the other hand, the upper flags are only relevant for firmware
>> updates, so we could check those (i.e. read 11 bytes) if a firmware was
>> provided via "firmware-name", and ignore them (i.e. read 8 bytes) otherwise.
>>
>> Other ideas or improvements to mine are more than welcome.
>
> I don't have any good ideas. On ACPI platforms the same device ID may
> be used with all of these, so we should actually try to figure out the
> version from registers like VID, DID and Version (if they are
> available).
>
> thanks,
>
VID and DID can be modified by the application firmware, but there is a
byte in the Version register we can use for this. According to TI[1], it
is guaranteed that the older TI PD controllers (TPS65981/2/6) will
always deliver AB = 0x00 when reading from the Version register, which
is 4 bytes long formatted like this: ABXX.YY.ZZ. The newer PD
controllers (TPS65987/8) will return either AB = 0xF7 (DH parts) or AB =
0xF9 (DK parts).
We can add some simple logic to read 8 bytes if AB is 0x00, which could
be the default as well, and 11 bytes otherwise.
Link:
https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1346521/tps65987d-register-command-to-distinguish-between-tps6591-2-6-and-tps65987-8
[1]
Thanks for your feedback and best regards,
Javier Carrasco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 16:55 [PATCH RESEND 0/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking in interrupt service routines Javier Carrasco
2024-03-28 16:55 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps25750 Javier Carrasco
2024-04-02 10:21 ` Heikki Krogerus
2024-03-28 16:55 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x Javier Carrasco
2024-04-02 10:29 ` Heikki Krogerus
2024-04-03 8:55 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-04-05 6:49 ` Heikki Krogerus
2024-04-11 20:13 ` Javier Carrasco [this message]
2024-04-02 10:21 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking in interrupt service routines Heikki Krogerus
2024-04-02 17:39 ` Javier Carrasco
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-28 16:25 Javier Carrasco
2024-03-28 16:25 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x Javier Carrasco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7ec1064-b82c-4721-853a-06b5710fdffa@wolfvision.net \
--to=javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net \
--cc=abdelalkuor@geotab.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®