From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934245AbdKPLA7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:00:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38390 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934187AbdKPLAt (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:00:49 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] KVM: X86: Add paravirt remote TLB flush To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Wanpeng Li Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Peter Zijlstra , Wanpeng Li References: <1510567280-19376-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> <1510567280-19376-3-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> <20171115211145.GY21113@char.us.oracle.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:00:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171115211145.GY21113@char.us.oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15/11/2017 22:11, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > If we migrate to another host that does not expose this, should the > flush_tlb_others be reset back to the generic one? Or we don't care that > much ? Migration to a host that does not expose the feature would be a configuration error. Paolo