RE: [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Add support for epoll min_wait

[David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>]

From: Stefan Hajnoczi
> Sent: 08 November 2022 17:24
...
> The way the current patches add min_wait into epoll_ctl() seems hacky to
> me. struct epoll_event was meant for file descriptor event entries. It
> won't necessarily be large enough for future extensions (luckily
> min_wait only needs a uint64_t value). It's turning epoll_ctl() into an
> ioctl()/setsockopt()-style interface, which is bad for anything that
> needs to understand syscalls, like seccomp. A properly typed
> epoll_wait3() seems cleaner to me.

Is there any reason you can't use an ioctl() on an epoll fd?
That would be cleaner that hacking at epoll_ctl().

It would also be easier to modify to allow (strange) things like:
- return if no events for 10ms.
- return 200us after the first event.
- return after 10 events.
- return at most 100 events.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)