mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Wanwu Li <liwanwu@kylinos.cn>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
	sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Fix NULL sched deref in kfunc sub-sched error paths
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 09:37:39 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d819e8358fffc09015feffad57794f7c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902170751.256434-1-liwanwu@kylinos.cn>

Hello,

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 01:07:51AM +0800, Wanwu Li wrote:
> Neither wrapper requires a contrived @p. Tasks that are never enabled --
> kthreads and tasks of other classes under SCX_SWITCH_ALL=n -- keep
> p->scx.sched NULL indefinitely; and a task handed over from

This isn't accurate. p->scx.sched is set for every non-idle task on root
enable and on fork regardless of sched class. The only tasks with NULL
p->scx.sched are the ones past sched_ext_dead() and the idle tasks. The new
comments repeat the same claim with "managed by another scheduler".

> Keep the "error out @p's scheduler" attribution -- it is what every other
> kfunc error path does (select_cpu_from_kfunc()'s cross_task,
> scx_kf_arg_task_ok()) and it is correct for the callers that take this

Both of those error out the calling program's scheduler, not @p's. The
compat wrappers are the only ones using @p's scheduler and only because
they don't have @aux.

> +	 * which scheduler called us, so error out @p's scheduler -- but read
> +	 * it under RCU (@p's locks aren't held here) and fall back to @sch if

@p's locks are held when called from ops.select_cpu() or ops.enqueue(). The
ext.c comment's "aren't necessarily held" is the right wording.

> +		scx_error(scx_task_sched_rcu(p) ?: sch,
> +			  "__scx_bpf_select_cpu_and() must be used");

As the fallback only triggers for tasks already past sched_ext_dead() (or
idle tasks), tearing down the root scheduler doesn't make sense. How about
adding a flag to the root sched and printing a warning once instead?

Thanks.

--
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 15:36 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix NULL sched deref in select_cpu_and sub-sched error path Wanwu Li
2026-09-02 16:14 ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-02 16:34   ` liwanwu
2026-09-02 17:07 ` [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Fix NULL sched deref in kfunc sub-sched error paths Wanwu Li
2026-09-02 18:11   ` Andrea Righi
2026-09-02 19:37   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-09-02 19:39     ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-03  6:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Wanwu Li
2026-09-03 17:56   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d819e8358fffc09015feffad57794f7c@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liwanwu@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®