From: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, seanjc@google.com,
peterz@infradead.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
davem@davemloft.net, ardb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
aik@amd.com, Michael.Roth@amd.com, Tycho.Andersen@amd.com,
Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
jackyli@google.com, pgonda@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
jacobhxu@google.com, xin@zytor.com,
pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, nikunj@amd.com, darwi@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/sev: Clear RMPOPT when segmented RMP is disabled by firmware
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 09:50:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d81f6807-26ac-49b9-a205-c89c394ec1d4@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102144805.GCauiipTaEXcg6Lr59@fat_crate.local>
Hello Boris,
On 11/2/2026 8:48 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 08:12:16AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> Heh, I don't think that is a nit, it is broken.
>>
>> I think the code as it was read fine, but that's just my opinion.
>
> Lemme see if you like this more (pasting it in applied form because the diff
> is unreadable):
>
> bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
> {
> if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP))
> goto out;
>
> rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
> if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED) {
> if (probe_segmented_rmptable_info())
> return true;
> }
>
> out:
> setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
> return probe_contiguous_rmptable_info();
> }
>
> No repeated code, no if-else conditionals, just what needs to happen.
The original patch returns false if segmented RMP is enabled but
probe_segmented_rmptable_info() fails, your version falls through to
probe_contiguous_rmptable_info() instead.
I believe it makes sense to keep the return false there: on a
segmented RMP enabled platform the RMP is segmented, not contiguous, so the
contiguous probe shouldn't run.
That's why i think the original patch looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Ashish
>
> Thx.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 19:48 [PATCH v4 0/2] x86/sev: Fix RMPOPT enablement on non-RMPOPT configs Ashish Kalra
2026-10-28 19:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/sev: Clear RMPOPT when segmented RMP is disabled by firmware Ashish Kalra
2026-10-28 21:51 ` Pankaj Gupta
2026-11-02 5:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-11-02 6:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-11-02 7:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-11-02 14:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-11-02 14:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-11-02 15:50 ` Kalra, Ashish [this message]
2026-10-28 19:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/sev: Set up RMPOPT only on an active SNP host Ashish Kalra
2026-10-28 22:00 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-10-29 15:33 ` Tom Lendacky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d81f6807-26ac-49b9-a205-c89c394ec1d4@amd.com \
--to=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackyli@google.com \
--cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®