From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F341C00140 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 17:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239329AbiGZRb6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:31:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57568 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239069AbiGZRb4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:31:56 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD001BE99 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id p11so18841084lfu.5 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nUsqrIcncbnAblsl66lT/lEZJ2lw+9ku+eiTV2ZWI6Y=; b=OyRS/08wVlN551H9uCmoUeTFl2tMNki5reqZdw3CT81GT8LgTsXqk1jO57wdUodH2g xc0iJX8XCvFuVYwQ/TJofmliTWDifgjexn294tm1ofBY/7Dkr9wcE3a0RHERg68yW0BF 9rS2N2dGVl2hPGLGPNDHr4BhG02/Gg1a0TpywMqZI2oScVjP9Q+tPkdGhZgbwHdPPlw+ 2mRzXFRQhiBmN/gldSjIrf6WnAU3VupQ4N9v0FxN/F02J9FkTy/8S8QqfDQFAnS3T9vT vybmAQ/bonklLF/sgF594c5gQRduNdZpShCNQ4bnixqwS575JB57AADT1wqextDJ1JFc qQqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nUsqrIcncbnAblsl66lT/lEZJ2lw+9ku+eiTV2ZWI6Y=; b=RVeCsrmBqSk8ArXD0ycCKjt6igei+3ZcHuA166ApkaVEfIR1TBio+EvyIRfG/J0SyE S9jZzdSHd6w6gxh6iGSV+NZxD+ftbTn9LGtgFhqBcWaZrcigHihf5Bm8h6qBIsoFpLQL BHqZAYUqAb8Lh9tvIU9vN4E6RX01B8DjhFoOZoUJj47vBaDuay3/U+cSkMaIBHWLnf40 +NJjGWLYc+JARtN9juQBG4tI7OHw/eZ4TXyAJ1HLJkyfAi9qTOn54oXgx70dy7KOp+aM fvebwrrnWAWSvepSDih5JhCSguTwG1oCbIC8g4zcorD4Qrqe4Ro09ltx68zKaJlT+ROq vlhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/gvJeM/8UynbNO2HGyeNh2QG5AQacLbOn50hKrLev9hY1iXYbV PYe4kJ/yZ/YnQqGQbHoHQ5RJMQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1thhHPJv1gCsMqopzoDCU3kSSNaevw3WpkoAl9o10A2PSZBRyQoWCrT5Ve7WL8oKcVOHuWQbg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1092:b0:48a:766e:7e20 with SMTP id j18-20020a056512109200b0048a766e7e20mr7071165lfg.646.1658856711127; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.197] (78-26-46-173.network.trollfjord.no. [78.26.46.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12-20020a19dc0c000000b0047f9cfa914csm3319933lfg.18.2022.07.26.10.31.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:31:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: bcm: use absolute path to other schema Content-Language: en-US To: Florian Fainelli , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , arm@kernel.org, soc@kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , Saenz Julienne , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220726115841.101249-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20220726115841.101249-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26/07/2022 17:59, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 7/26/22 04:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Absolute path to other DT schema is preferred over relative one. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli > > Are you applying those patches or do you want the SoC maintainer to do that? The best if you (SoC maintainer) would pick them up. If you cannot or it is too late for this, maybe arm-soc could grab them (already Cced). Best regards, Krzysztof