From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.p.donnelly@oracle.com,
"Hillf Danton" <hdanton@sina.com>,
"Ting11 Wang 王婷" <wangting11@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] locking/rwsem: Prevent non-first waiter from spinning in down_write() slowpath
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 19:53:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d85422c0-9124-309e-e854-2ac228f5b792@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221012133333.1265281-2-longman@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 10/12/2022 7:03 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> A non-first waiter can potentially spin in the for loop of
> rwsem_down_write_slowpath() without sleeping but fail to acquire the
> lock even if the rwsem is free if the following sequence happens:
>
> Non-first waiter First waiter Lock holder
> ---------------- ------------ -----------
> Acquire wait_lock
> rwsem_try_write_lock():
> Set handoff bit if RT or
> wait too long
> Set waiter->handoff_set
> Release wait_lock
> Acquire wait_lock
> Inherit waiter->handoff_set
> Release wait_lock
> Clear owner
> Release lock
> if (waiter.handoff_set) {
> rwsem_spin_on_owner(();
> if (OWNER_NULL)
> goto trylock_again;
> }
> trylock_again:
> Acquire wait_lock
> rwsem_try_write_lock():
> if (first->handoff_set && (waiter != first))
> return false;
> Release wait_lock
>
> It is especially problematic if the non-first waiter is an RT task and
> it is running on the same CPU as the first waiter as this can lead to
> live lock.
>
> Fixes: d257cc8cb8d5 ("locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Since this patch is tested and it covers the mentioned scenario.
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
-Mukesh
> ---
> kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> index 44873594de03..3839b38608da 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> @@ -636,6 +636,11 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> new = count;
>
> if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) {
> + /*
> + * A waiter (first or not) can set the handoff bit
> + * if it is an RT task or wait in the wait queue
> + * for too long.
> + */
> if (has_handoff || (!rt_task(waiter->task) &&
> !time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout)))
> return false;
> @@ -651,11 +656,13 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> } while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count, new));
>
> /*
> - * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or
> - * set the handoff bit.
> + * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or set
> + * the handoff bit. Only the first waiter can have its handoff_set
> + * set here to enable optimistic spinning in slowpath loop.
> */
> if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) {
> - waiter->handoff_set = true;
> + if (waiter == first)
> + waiter->handoff_set = true;
> lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_handoff);
> return false
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-12 13:33 [PATCH v2 0/2] locking/rwsem: Fix rwsem waiter optimistic spinning problem with RT tasks Waiman Long
2022-10-12 13:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] locking/rwsem: Prevent non-first waiter from spinning in down_write() slowpath Waiman Long
2022-10-12 14:23 ` Mukesh Ojha [this message]
2022-10-13 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-13 13:33 ` Waiman Long
2022-10-13 15:37 ` Waiman Long
2022-10-12 13:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Limit # of null owner retries for handoff writer Waiman Long
2022-10-12 14:38 ` Mukesh Ojha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d85422c0-9124-309e-e854-2ac228f5b792@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=john.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangting11@xiaomi.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®