mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.p.donnelly@oracle.com,
	"Hillf Danton" <hdanton@sina.com>,
	"Ting11 Wang 王婷" <wangting11@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] locking/rwsem: Prevent non-first waiter from spinning in down_write() slowpath
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 19:53:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d85422c0-9124-309e-e854-2ac228f5b792@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221012133333.1265281-2-longman@redhat.com>

Hi,


On 10/12/2022 7:03 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> A non-first waiter can potentially spin in the for loop of
> rwsem_down_write_slowpath() without sleeping but fail to acquire the
> lock even if the rwsem is free if the following sequence happens:
> 
>    Non-first waiter       First waiter      Lock holder
>    ----------------       ------------      -----------
>    Acquire wait_lock
>    rwsem_try_write_lock():
>      Set handoff bit if RT or
>        wait too long
>      Set waiter->handoff_set
>    Release wait_lock
>                           Acquire wait_lock
>                           Inherit waiter->handoff_set
>                           Release wait_lock
> 					   Clear owner
>                                             Release lock
>    if (waiter.handoff_set) {
>      rwsem_spin_on_owner(();
>      if (OWNER_NULL)
>        goto trylock_again;
>    }
>    trylock_again:
>    Acquire wait_lock
>    rwsem_try_write_lock():
>       if (first->handoff_set && (waiter != first))
>       	return false;
>    Release wait_lock
> 
> It is especially problematic if the non-first waiter is an RT task and
> it is running on the same CPU as the first waiter as this can lead to
> live lock.
> 
> Fixes: d257cc8cb8d5 ("locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

Since this patch is tested and it covers the mentioned scenario.

Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>

-Mukesh
> ---
>   kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> index 44873594de03..3839b38608da 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> @@ -636,6 +636,11 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
>   		new = count;
>   
>   		if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) {
> +			/*
> +			 * A waiter (first or not) can set the handoff bit
> +			 * if it is an RT task or wait in the wait queue
> +			 * for too long.
> +			 */
>   			if (has_handoff || (!rt_task(waiter->task) &&
>   					    !time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout)))
>   				return false;
> @@ -651,11 +656,13 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
>   	} while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count, new));
>   
>   	/*
> -	 * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or
> -	 * set the handoff bit.
> +	 * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or set
> +	 * the handoff bit. Only the first waiter can have its handoff_set
> +	 * set here to enable optimistic spinning in slowpath loop.
>   	 */
>   	if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) {
> -		waiter->handoff_set = true;
> +		if (waiter == first)
> +			waiter->handoff_set = true;
>   		lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_handoff);
>   		return false
>   	}

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-12 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-12 13:33 [PATCH v2 0/2] locking/rwsem: Fix rwsem waiter optimistic spinning problem with RT tasks Waiman Long
2022-10-12 13:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] locking/rwsem: Prevent non-first waiter from spinning in down_write() slowpath Waiman Long
2022-10-12 14:23   ` Mukesh Ojha [this message]
2022-10-13 10:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-13 13:33     ` Waiman Long
2022-10-13 15:37       ` Waiman Long
2022-10-12 13:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Limit # of null owner retries for handoff writer Waiman Long
2022-10-12 14:38   ` Mukesh Ojha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d85422c0-9124-309e-e854-2ac228f5b792@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=john.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wangting11@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®