From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
"open list:BTRFS FILE SYSTEM" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] btrfs: handle bio_split() error
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:08:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d892421f-3ecb-428a-b65e-4f0d0f5f08fe@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9eec1ccb-6e56-4701-83bf-3397d1bc5197@oracle.com>
On 13.11.24 10:51, John Garry wrote:
> On 04/11/2024 12:13, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
>>
>> Now that bio_split() can return errors, add error handling for it in
>> btrfs_split_bio() and ultimately btrfs_submit_chunk().
>
> I have a couple of comments, below; However, since I am not familiar
> with the code, maybe they are invalid.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This is based on top of John Garry's series "bio_split() error handling
>> rework" explicitly on the patch titled "block: Rework bio_split() return
>> value", which are as of now (Tue Oct 29 10:02:16 2024) not yet merged into
>> any tree.
>>
>> Changes to v2:
>> - assign the split bbio to a new variable, so we can keep the old error
>> paths and end the original bbio
>>
>> Changes to v1:
>> - convert ERR_PTR to blk_status_t
>> - correctly fail already split bbios
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/bio.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.c b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
>> index 1f216d07eff6..7a0998d0abe3 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ static struct btrfs_bio *btrfs_split_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>>
>> bio = bio_split(&orig_bbio->bio, map_length >> SECTOR_SHIFT, GFP_NOFS,
>> &btrfs_clone_bioset);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bio))
>> + return ERR_CAST(bio);
>> +
>> bbio = btrfs_bio(bio);
>> btrfs_bio_init(bbio, fs_info, NULL, orig_bbio);
>> bbio->inode = orig_bbio->inode;
>> @@ -678,7 +681,7 @@ static bool btrfs_submit_chunk(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, int mirror_num)
>> &bioc, &smap, &mirror_num);
>> if (error) {
>> ret = errno_to_blk_status(error);
>> - goto fail;
>> + goto end_bbio;
>
> eh, I am not sure why this has changed (and we now skip the "fail" label
> actions)
Because we want to skip the 'if (map_length < length) {' part below the
'fail' label and directly go to btrfs_bio_end_io().
>> }
>>
>> map_length = min(map_length, length);
>> @@ -686,7 +689,14 @@ static bool btrfs_submit_chunk(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, int mirror_num)
>> map_length = btrfs_append_map_length(bbio, map_length);
>>
>> if (map_length < length) {
>> - bbio = btrfs_split_bio(fs_info, bbio, map_length);
>> + struct btrfs_bio *split;
>> +
>> + split = btrfs_split_bio(fs_info, bbio, map_length);
>> + if (IS_ERR(split)) {
>> + ret = errno_to_blk_status(PTR_ERR(split));
>> + goto end_bbio;
>
> Do we need to undo the btrfs_bio_counter_inc() (not shown)?
Yes we do.
>
>> + }
>> + bbio = split;
>> bio = &bbio->bio;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -760,6 +770,7 @@ static bool btrfs_submit_chunk(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, int mirror_num)
>>
>> btrfs_bio_end_io(remaining, ret);
>> }
>> +end_bbio:
>> btrfs_bio_end_io(bbio, ret);
>> /* Do not submit another chunk */
>> return true;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 12:13 Johannes Thumshirn
2024-11-13 9:51 ` John Garry
2024-11-13 10:08 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2024-12-02 10:34 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d892421f-3ecb-428a-b65e-4f0d0f5f08fe@wdc.com \
--to=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®