From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274603D6CB3; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774444004; cv=none; b=CKzcr274U+zVX5C/PNJ5qd7vLy5ELbFcxHMh0R2Ohnnkm6MxNkNl+Lqmm/eU638Ez1WpoZDT/xu67PgrYAMDrc8YKEWU5ULCQH7jZgNMXRkZRbGT0s8J84+IYGNLfIW/XKjDIqHeVwBfGsHMQgUzeVv5o5k1ff5Obu3wyFETM80= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774444004; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ysGgkm7RAbMGLbp+nmakxZ2OFqthXnUOMciBC0itf8Q=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HUYULNsdwZLwb9e8Z9Zbnxi4IS7MNyWMODN/F48SN6ZA1NfKAYuU9kH0c5YGM8hVKdL6rUssoGNS0P4/m5cmUn3jrKbTaV14J1W6piysGjOZrCNIslTF63MTbs7RNctyCa4Naj1JsicFTzLH3v7ooGbMo+6rVYpbPbW5/EueeDk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Xvgt3OXD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Xvgt3OXD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774444003; x=1805980003; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=ysGgkm7RAbMGLbp+nmakxZ2OFqthXnUOMciBC0itf8Q=; b=Xvgt3OXDUJSZAuXEv0dPZjZkpC1AhPdPbs5h/n3VOs8UFg9UW6iztBpo E666vhyTbEx8kFbbgHE/c8JbKwyejvdA3MuJ8KyVMxerPH+n90ema4kXa gNWJcLZGy0xxT8oJ25uqT7lSSa4trfXbZgKE1oLbIEizrE8/vnw/1iPG0 3ioXFvPMawBoTfyOwzUutrIxli+5aHQLX2skzLvZyx8Ojdk5DuRS+m8Vt h+rrMBFZyUoX/J8R08+awOd9ty1cdujhlOSBJsFaOzWHqNc2rVvnr06gS o9T547SHsIXpTuIcBKhTq5FCDLalI6Pcu683MXHW/LJenAlhy3i4wMjuZ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: pDwRo5uuQmGuRXUGo7MAjA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SqKPUF9mSx6Yg5eSGeIejA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11739"; a="63025996" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,140,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="63025996" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2026 06:06:43 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9s7RfkYpSzSW8+0lkUiisA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gaY2/oQuTkunKn2u1oX30w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,140,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="224686563" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.125]) by orviesa008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2026 06:06:40 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:06:36 +0200 (EET) To: Werner Sembach cc: W_Armin@gmx.de, Hans de Goede , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] platform/x86: uniwill-laptop: More support for TUXEDO devices In-Reply-To: <84878980-ff70-42bc-8556-0a21f30a5290@tuxedocomputers.com> Message-ID: References: <20260324203413.454361-1-wse@tuxedocomputers.com> <704a7de4-ee2e-5f1b-56e1-452fbb1af242@linux.intel.com> <84878980-ff70-42bc-8556-0a21f30a5290@tuxedocomputers.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-130147530-1774443996=:976" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-130147530-1774443996=:976 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 25 Mar 2026, Werner Sembach wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Am 25.03.26 um 13:40 schrieb Ilpo J=C3=A4rvinen: > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2026, Werner Sembach wrote: > >=20 > > > v2: Incorporate Armins feedback. > > > v3: Incorporate more of Armins feedback. > > > Rework USB-C power prio functions > > > v4: Readd system vendor SchenkerTechnologiesGmbH for XMG FUSION (L19) > > > Replace for loops with if statements for USB-C power priority > > > functions > > > Add missing mutex in usb_c_power_priority_restore > > > v5: Restructure patch around new entry for XMG Fusion > > > Add missing Reviewed-by and Tested-by > > > Spelling fixes in documentation > > > v6: Fix small format error in docs > > > Fix Reviewed-by line > > > v7: Variable rename to lowercase > > > v8: Move USB-C power priority init to after probe call > > > Clarify documentation > > Hi, > >=20 > > Does this conflict with something that went through the fixes branch? I > > tried applying this through for-next and get fails so I guess I'll have > > to merge fixes to for-next before I can apply this. > >=20 > > It would be nice to mention any known conflicts in the coverletter. >=20 > sorry, I thought the base-commit line was enough >=20 > it applies cleanly to v7.0-rc3 and v7.0-rc4 >=20 > earlier rc versions of 7.0 are missing a required patch Okay, so there's a dependency for some commit that went through 'fixes'? > maybe for-next is not yet rebased on the latest rc? 'fixes' and 'for-next' are sort of independent normally. Both are based at= =20 -rc1. I don't rebase 'for-next' from -rc1. If there's a conflict or some 'fixes'= =20 commit needed for a work to be done in 'for-next', I'll resolve those by=20 merging 'fixes' changes back into 'for-next. > I will have a look --=20 i. --8323328-130147530-1774443996=:976--