Re: [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add LLCC BWMON

[Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>]

On 7/22/22 7:29 PM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>
> On 7/22/22 12:30 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 22/07/2022 03:22, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On 7/20/22 2:28 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> The SDM845 comes with few instances of Bandwidth Monitor.  The already
>>>> supported one monitors traffic between CPU and Last Level Cache
>>>> Controller (LLCC) and in downstream sources is called BWMON v4 (or 
>>>> v4 of
>>>> register layout).
>>>>
>>>> SDM845 also has also BWMON instance measuring traffic between LLCC and
>>>> memory with different register layout: called v5.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@quicinc.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 37 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi 
>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>>> index fe14f7e7523b..4aab464e2bd6 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>>> @@ -2053,6 +2053,43 @@ llcc: system-cache-controller@1100000 {
>>>>                interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>>            };
>>>>    +        pmu@114a000 {
>>>> +            compatible = "qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon";
>>>> +            reg = <0 0x0114a000 0 0x1000>;
>>>> +            interrupts = <GIC_SPI 580 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>> +            interconnects = <&mem_noc MASTER_LLCC 3 &mem_noc 
>>>> SLAVE_EBI1 3>;
>>>> +
>>>> +            operating-points-v2 = <&llcc_bwmon_opp_table>;
>>>> +
>>>> +            llcc_bwmon_opp_table: opp-table {
>>>> +                compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>>> +
>>>> +                /*
>>>> +                 * The interconnect path bandwidth taken from
>>>> +                 * cpu4_opp_table bandwidth for gladiator_noc-mem_noc
>>>> +                 * interconnect.  This also matches the
>>>> +                 * bandwidth table of qcom,llccbw (qcom,bw-tbl,
>>>> +                 * bus width: 4 bytes) from msm-4.9 downstream
>>>> +                 * kernel.
>>>> +                 */
>>>> +                opp-0 {
>>>> +                    opp-peak-kBps = <800000>;
>>>> +                };
>>>> +                opp-1 {
>>>> +                    opp-peak-kBps = <1804000>;
>>>> +                };
>>>> +                opp-2 {
>>>> +                    opp-peak-kBps = <3072000>;
>>>> +                };
>>>> +                opp-3 {
>>>> +                    opp-peak-kBps = <5412000>;
>>>> +                };
>>>> +                opp-4 {
>>>> +                    opp-peak-kBps = <7216000>;
>>>> +                };
>>>> +            };
>>>> +        };
>>>> +
>>>>            pmu@1436400 {
>>>>                compatible = "qcom,sdm845-bwmon", "qcom,msm8998-bwmon";
>>>>                reg = <0 0x01436400 0 0x600>;
>>>
>>> With this series applied, testing on a Lenovo Yoga C630, which has an
>>> SDM850, I see the following:
>>>
>>> [    3.673660] qcom-bwmon 114a000.pmu: can't request region for 
>>> resource
>>> [mem 0x0114a000-0x0114afff]
>>> [    3.673673] qcom-bwmon 114a000.pmu: error -EBUSY: failed to map 
>>> bwmon
>>> registers
>>> [    3.673678] qcom-bwmon: probe of 114a000.pmu failed with error -16
>>>
>> Thanks for the report. What are you running there? `uname -r`? Maybe
>> your secure world uses it?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> Currently it's 5.19.0-rc7 (torvalds tree at 4ba1329c) with a few extra 
> patches on top, the bwmon set included.  It's possible that secure 
> world uses it, but I do not know enough about that to say one way or 
> the other.
>
> -- steev
>
I think you may be right; I just applied this patchset to -next 
(20220722) and i do not see the error message there.  On my 5.19-rc7 
tree, i am also testing a patchset that enables qcom devices to access 
efivars, so possibly we are ending up in secure world there?