mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@redhat.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 9/9] jump_label: Batch up if arch supports it
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:33:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8a417e9-eb0f-d087-f0c5-7405b030e51c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181218123556.5257b1a7@gandalf.local.home>

On 12/18/18 6:35 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:46:38 +0100
> Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I'd say add this file first, before x86 supports it. That way it's easy
> for you to test if this file is correct for other archs that do not
> support it.
> 
> When x86 supports it, the "on switch" for that should be the added
> config, just like what other architectures will do.

right!

>> If the architecture supports the batching of jump label updates, use it!
>>
>> An easy way to see the benefits of this patch is switching the
>> schedstats on and off. For instance:
>>
>> -------------------------- %< ---------------------------- 
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> while [ true ]; do 
>>     sysctl -w kernel.sched_schedstats=1
>>     sleep 2
>>     sysctl -w kernel.sched_schedstats=0
>>     sleep 2
>> done
>> -------------------------- >% ----------------------------  
>>
>> while watching the IPI count:
>>
>> -------------------------- %< ---------------------------- 
>> # watch -n1 "cat /proc/interrupts | grep Function"
>> -------------------------- >% ----------------------------  
>>
>> With the current mode, it is possible to see +- 168 IPIs each 2 seconds,
>> while with this patch the number of IPIs goes to 3 each 2 seconds.
>>
>> Regarding the performance impact of this patch set, I made two measurements:
>>
>>     The time to update a key (the task that is causing the change)
>>     The time to run the int3 handler (the side effect on a thread that
>>                                       hits the code being changed)
>>
>> The schedstats static key was chosen as the key to being switched on and off.
>> The reason being is that it is used in more than 56 places, in a hot path. The
>> change in the schedstats static key will be done with the following command:
>>
>> while [ true ]; do
>>     sysctl -w kernel.sched_schedstats=1
>>     usleep 500000
>>     sysctl -w kernel.sched_schedstats=0
>>     usleep 500000
>> done
>>
>> In this way, they key will be updated twice per second. To force the hit of the
>> int3 handler, the system will also run a kernel compilation with two jobs per
>> CPU. The test machine is a two nodes/24 CPUs box with an Intel Xeon processor
>> @2.27GHz.
>>
>> Regarding the update part, on average, the regular kernel takes 57 ms to update
>> the schedstats key, while the kernel with the batch updates takes just 1.4 ms
>> on average. Although it seems to be too good to be true, it makes sense: the
>> schedstats key is used in 56 places, so it was expected that it would take
>> around 56 times to update the keys with the current implementation, as the
>> IPIs are the most expensive part of the update.
>>
>> Regarding the int3 handler, the non-batch handler takes 45 ns on average, while
>> the batch version takes around 180 ns. At first glance, it seems to be a high
>> value. But it is not, considering that it is doing 56 updates, rather than one!
>> It is taking four times more, only. This gain is possible because the patch
>> uses a binary search in the vector: log2(56)=5.8. So, it was expected to have
>> an overhead within four times.
>>
>> (voice of tv propaganda) But, that is not all! As the int3 handler keeps on for
>> a shorter period (because the update part is on for a shorter time), the number
>> of hits in the int3 handler decreased by 10%.
>>
>> The question then is: Is it worth paying the price of "135 ns" more in the int3
>> handler?
>>
>> Considering that, in this test case, we are saving the handling of 53 IPIs,
>> that takes more than these 135 ns, it seems to be a meager price to be paid.
>> Moreover, the test case was forcing the hit of the int3, in practice, it
>> does not take that often. While the IPI takes place on all CPUs, hitting
>> the int3 handler or not!
>>
>> For instance, in an isolated CPU with a process running in user-space
>> (nohz_full use-case), the chances of hitting the int3 handler is barely zero,
>> while there is no way to avoid the IPIs. By bounding the IPIs, we are improving
>> a lot this scenario.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>> Cc: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>> Cc: Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
>> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
>> Cc: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
>> Cc: x86@kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>  include/linux/jump_label.h |  3 +++
>>  kernel/jump_label.c        | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
>> index c88d903befc0..ed51ef3e1abd 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
>> @@ -219,6 +219,9 @@ extern void arch_jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
>>  				      enum jump_label_type type);
>>  extern void arch_jump_label_transform_static(struct jump_entry *entry,
>>  					     enum jump_label_type type);
>> +extern int arch_jump_label_transform_queue(struct jump_entry *entry,
>> +					    enum jump_label_type type);
>> +extern void arch_jump_label_transform_apply(void);
>>  extern int jump_label_text_reserved(void *start, void *end);
>>  extern void static_key_slow_inc(struct static_key *key);
>>  extern void static_key_slow_dec(struct static_key *key);
>> diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c
>> index 22093b5f57c9..08ace142af0a 100644
>> --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
>> +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
>> @@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ bool jump_label_can_update_check(struct jump_entry *entry, bool init)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +#ifndef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL_BATCH
>>  static void __jump_label_update(struct static_key *key,
>>  				struct jump_entry *entry,
>>  				struct jump_entry *stop,
>> @@ -421,6 +422,34 @@ static void __jump_label_update(struct static_key *key,
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  }
>> +#else
>> +static void __jump_label_update(struct static_key *key,
>> +				struct jump_entry *entry,
>> +				struct jump_entry *stop,
>> +				bool init)
>> +{
>> +	for_each_label_entry(key, entry, stop) {
>> +
>> +		if (!jump_label_can_update_check(entry, init))
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		if (arch_jump_label_transform_queue(entry,
>> +						    jump_label_type(entry)))
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Queue's overflow: Apply the current queue, and then
>> +		 * queue again. If it stills not possible to queue, BUG!
>> +		 */
>> +		arch_jump_label_transform_apply();
>> +		if (!arch_jump_label_transform_queue(entry,
>> +						     jump_label_type(entry))) {
>> +			BUG();
> 
> Why BUG()? Do you really want to crash Linus's machine?

I am using BUG() because that is what I see in other part of jump_label code:
	If something goes wrong:
		BUG().

What I could do here is:

Add a "fallback" boll that is disabled by default.
If I hit this case:
	WARN()
	turn "fallback" on, returning to the old mode (without batch)

Sound better?

Thanks!
-- Daniel

> -- Steve
> 
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	arch_jump_label_transform_apply();
>> +}
>> +#endif
>>  
>>  void __init jump_label_init(void)
>>  {
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-18 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-18 16:46 [PATCH V2 0/9] x86/jump_label: Bound IPIs sent when updating a static key Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 16:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/9] jump_label: Add for_each_label_entry helper Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 21:19   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-19  7:38     ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-19 10:37       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-18 16:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/9] jump_label: Add the jump_label_can_update_check() helper Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 16:46 ` [PATCH V2 3/9] x86/jump_label: Move checking code away from __jump_label_transform() Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-19  8:43   ` Jiri Kosina
2018-12-19  8:49     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-19 10:14       ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 16:46 ` [PATCH V2 4/9] x86/jump_label: Add __jump_label_set_jump_code() helper Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 16:46 ` [PATCH V2 5/9] x86/alternative: Split text_poke_bp() into tree steps Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 17:25   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-19  8:44   ` Jiri Kosina
2018-12-18 16:46 ` [PATCH V2 6/9] jump_label: Sort entries of the same key by the code Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 16:46 ` [PATCH V2 7/9] x86/alternative: Batch of patch operations Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 17:31   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-18 19:27     ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 16:46 ` [PATCH V2 8/9] x86/jump_label: Batch jump label updates Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 16:46 ` [PATCH V2 9/9] jump_label: Batch up if arch supports it Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2018-12-18 17:35   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-18 19:33     ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira [this message]
2018-12-18 20:32       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-18 21:06         ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d8a417e9-eb0f-d087-f0c5-7405b030e51c@redhat.com \
    --to=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=crecklin@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=swood@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhouchengming1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®