From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289C526B0A9 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763440656; cv=none; b=pcZ8odh5GL0Y4GXOpocfFp0BPGb2b1gEOhXXp/rwT7TRg4iisA8pk6ZH5H2VzNlHCzNjUisBL68TxAoJucN8+Puci3dduirh2rCGWSjttmIQh+ctg0IIdzsMiksSNBGOoVwlyjuEB+FcqsMPhSjXhRXdIWpnSGQ7hPnwElmxmgY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763440656; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k1X8ckmj9dfBI7nXSGNLfTGSwwlvzScvMSOsgcP4z5Q=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=uetSK9ohsDEuyOxueKjb2QxGzmoYIF+xc95lFHPE0VXHszRx6Ov2r1/fAjlbNDlvXQ57DQv5vC4aUtxRlDFkgywt+MyATJ699e7XTiDBs4bI/UrYHAdZEKdg3mOZiSPIuPc3/sNOyKdzX8O9oAxwDFmGE1Tgs+oduwow7MbesU4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=Cw98/BtG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="Cw98/BtG" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5AHEb8rO001887; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:37:00 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=qz2qkX nymPfHY9NoTSfsbYmie0HGdIyjjB3BiSSCJm8=; b=Cw98/BtGtV7nCQhQcN1N0s uUQq4Gk+ySFkA6glq8t9rN66N1M9R2u24QRojO4Tdq7N/KV+E1xnjXipZx5k3/YS E0TjxNZ5Qv5an7OUxW7wqAb1PZ9+b4lrBHCjLkP+gTz9myJ8GbEq4wD3UsukQZ1I 2q4xkSgno4C3qzU7qH8nXzxPu6FKaMncv6TaCBUR9JHyDQ8axl2eFpOhCJhr/q/t edOpfBCBr8rZtZD5BUh5KIEJ9kRVsOlvEtXHwHR5PGvy+SSzK4De+o2xT13mmCPu uoXIJ31QmpvKUREQj2Fn7tQEYFQxteAFn2ElgzEzmgpgSe5rVYNK1PhlEnxSm/aw == Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4aejjtrv4j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:37:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353725.ppops.net (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.1.12/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 5AI4UhRm021641; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:36:59 GMT Received: from ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (db.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.219]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4aejjtrv4f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:36:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5AI4RqcK017326; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:36:58 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.229]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4af6j1h273-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:36:58 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.101]) by smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 5AI4avCB34865630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:36:57 GMT Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF2720043; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:36:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E3220040; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:36:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.124.214.85] (unknown [9.124.214.85]) by smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:36:54 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:06:53 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [patch V4 09/20] cpumask: Cache num_possible_cpus() To: Thomas Gleixner , LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Gabriele Monaco , Mathieu Desnoyers , Michael Jeanson , Jens Axboe , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Gautham R. Shenoy" , Florian Weimer , Tim Chen , Yury Norov References: <20251104075053.700034556@linutronix.de> <20251104075427.221776184@linutronix.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Shrikanth Hegde In-Reply-To: <20251104075427.221776184@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: jK5wjghSk2gzU6cIt2W64X0CfSS-qS3Z X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: oDCURkcaQ2l-pA1JOztsQ6Oa0BIEKJNX X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMTE1MDAzMiBTYWx0ZWRfXzjUW3D66Qxdi 6FJvj1r6M5jd2uDcR/zha1CY9wp3NHqBWr2jhy1esUVtcJB3Pdn2g1PrQVwSS1ZppsDaT5VmhOa kNMIBEcCfs13ZhvjaLhzDZ4NPVry/oBaYfL0l19zPKvVest96llVbMUT3htCFNMfI5YDe+SXm6K lpqkX1yWRTT7wvc6dRRvFB9rmppbHhYEkphB2h3ppDNq2VSJRxFcVnEAAUENIdxeNa4WrqcpJJg hI+3A0iVbiA/dP9gX0LoOju2Xnlhd0STEnYLbQ776YTYeA0Mvj1wfnwOGuk7tBJRcfHNae8KQWZ ruPCUpfThvUXr0uWeRUMDtIcRB308xb9E6GcHZmfSrJF/d0R0JAg8Qvxe8bS9YHjl2NJwHw1IbD Iyf4nCYfHv+G3HfiiHvYc0EFNrgWLA== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=SvOdKfO0 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=691bf7ec cx=c_pps a=aDMHemPKRhS1OARIsFnwRA==:117 a=aDMHemPKRhS1OARIsFnwRA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=6UeiqGixMTsA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=CfIrE29hSfw6gz0BbtgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=cPQSjfK2_nFv0Q5t_7PE:22 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2025-11-17_04,2025-11-13_02,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510240000 definitions=main-2511150032 On 11/17/25 2:18 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Reevaluating num_possible_cpus() over and over does not make sense. That > becomes a constant after init as cpu_possible_mask is marked ro_after_init. > > Cache the value during initialization and provide that for consumption. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Reviewed-by: Yury Norov Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde