From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] kernfs: Allow kernfs nodes to be deactivated and re-activated
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 13:49:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d918a1f5-40f4-c90c-a7f5-720dcfddb89b@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220820000550.367085-7-tj@kernel.org>
On 2022/8/20 08:05, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Currently, kernfs nodes can be created deactivated and activated later to
> allow creation of multiple nodes to succeed or fail as a group. Extend this
> capability so that kernfs nodes can be deactivated and re-activated anytime
> and however many times. This can be used to toggle interface files for
> features which can be dynamically turned on and off.
>
> kernfs_activate()'s skip conditions are updated so that it doesn't ignore
> re-activations and suppress re-activations of files which are being removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> ---
> fs/kernfs/dir.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> include/linux/kernfs.h | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> index f857731598cd..6db031362585 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static bool kernfs_drain(struct kernfs_node *kn)
> * worrying about draining.
> */
> if (atomic_read(&kn->active) == KN_DEACTIVATED_BIAS &&
> - kernfs_should_drain_open_files(kn))
> + !kernfs_should_drain_open_files(kn))
> return false;
>
> up_write(&root->kernfs_rwsem);
> @@ -1321,14 +1321,15 @@ static struct kernfs_node *kernfs_next_descendant_post(struct kernfs_node *pos,
> }
>
> /**
> - * kernfs_activate - activate a node which started deactivated
> + * kernfs_activate - activate a node's subtree
> * @kn: kernfs_node whose subtree is to be activated
> *
> - * If the root has KERNFS_ROOT_CREATE_DEACTIVATED set, a newly created node
> - * needs to be explicitly activated. A node which hasn't been activated
> - * isn't visible to userland and deactivation is skipped during its
> - * removal. This is useful to construct atomic init sequences where
> - * creation of multiple nodes should either succeed or fail atomically.
> + * If newly created on a root w/ %KERNFS_ROOT_CREATE_DEACTIVATED or after a
> + * kernfs_deactivate() call, @kn is deactivated and invisible to userland. This
> + * function activates all nodes in @kn's inclusive subtree making them visible.
> + *
> + * %KERNFS_ROOT_CREATE_DEACTIVATED is useful when constructing init sequences
> + * where creation of multiple nodes should either succeed or fail atomically.
> *
> * The caller is responsible for ensuring that this function is not called
> * after kernfs_remove*() is invoked on @kn.
> @@ -1342,7 +1343,7 @@ void kernfs_activate(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>
> pos = NULL;
> while ((pos = kernfs_next_descendant_post(pos, kn))) {
> - if (pos->flags & KERNFS_ACTIVATED)
> + if (kernfs_active(pos) || (kn->flags & KERNFS_REMOVING))
May I ask a question, what's the difference between kernfs_active() and KERNFS_ACTIVATED?
KERNFS_ACTIVATED is always set when kernfs_activate() and never clear, so I think it means:
1. !KERNFS_ACTIVATED : allocated but not activated
2. KERNFS_ACTIVATED && !kernfs_active() : make deactivated by kernfs_deactivate_locked()
I see most code check kernfs_active(), but two places check KERNFS_ACTIVATED, I'm not sure where
should check KERNFS_ACTIVATED, or is there any chance we can remove KERNFS_ACTIVATED?
Thanks!
> continue;
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(pos->parent && RB_EMPTY_NODE(&pos->rb));
> @@ -1355,6 +1356,58 @@ void kernfs_activate(struct kernfs_node *kn)
> up_write(&root->kernfs_rwsem);
> }
>
> +static void kernfs_deactivate_locked(struct kernfs_node *kn, bool removing)
> +{
> + struct kernfs_root *root = kernfs_root(kn);
> + struct kernfs_node *pos;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&root->kernfs_rwsem);
> +
> + /* prevent any new usage under @kn by deactivating all nodes */
> + pos = NULL;
> + while ((pos = kernfs_next_descendant_post(pos, kn))) {
> + if (kernfs_active(pos))
> + atomic_add(KN_DEACTIVATED_BIAS, &pos->active);
> + if (removing)
> + pos->flags |= KERNFS_REMOVING;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * No new active usage can be created. Drain existing ones. As
> + * kernfs_drain() may drop kernfs_rwsem temporarily, pin @pos so that it
> + * doesn't go away underneath us.
> + *
> + * If kernfs_rwsem was released, restart from the beginning. Forward
> + * progress is guaranteed as a drained node is guaranteed to stay
> + * drained. In the unlikely case that the loop restart ever becomes a
> + * problem, we should be able to work around by batching up the
> + * draining.
> + */
> + pos = NULL;
> + while ((pos = kernfs_next_descendant_post(pos, kn))) {
> + kernfs_get(pos);
> + if (kernfs_drain(pos))
> + pos = NULL;
> + kernfs_put(pos);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kernfs_deactivate - deactivate a node's subtree
> + * @kn: kernfs_node whose subtree is to be deactivated
> + *
> + * Deactivate @kn's inclusive subtree. On return, the subtree is invisible to
> + * userland and there are no in-flight file operations.
> + */
> +void kernfs_deactivate(struct kernfs_node *kn)
> +{
> + struct kernfs_root *root = kernfs_root(kn);
> +
> + down_write(&root->kernfs_rwsem);
> + kernfs_deactivate_locked(kn, false);
> + up_write(&root->kernfs_rwsem);
> +}
> +
> static void __kernfs_remove(struct kernfs_node *kn)
> {
> struct kernfs_node *pos;
> @@ -1374,26 +1427,12 @@ static void __kernfs_remove(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>
> pr_debug("kernfs %s: removing\n", kn->name);
>
> - /* prevent any new usage under @kn by deactivating all nodes */
> - pos = NULL;
> - while ((pos = kernfs_next_descendant_post(pos, kn)))
> - if (kernfs_active(pos))
> - atomic_add(KN_DEACTIVATED_BIAS, &pos->active);
> + kernfs_deactivate_locked(kn, true);
>
> - /* deactivate and unlink the subtree node-by-node */
> + /* unlink the subtree node-by-node */
> do {
> pos = kernfs_leftmost_descendant(kn);
>
> - /*
> - * kernfs_drain() may drop kernfs_rwsem temporarily and @pos's
> - * base ref could have been put by someone else by the time
> - * the function returns. Make sure it doesn't go away
> - * underneath us.
> - */
> - kernfs_get(pos);
> -
> - kernfs_drain(pos);
> -
> /*
> * kernfs_unlink_sibling() succeeds once per node. Use it
> * to decide who's responsible for cleanups.
> @@ -1410,8 +1449,6 @@ static void __kernfs_remove(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>
> kernfs_put(pos);
> }
> -
> - kernfs_put(pos);
> } while (pos != kn);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernfs.h b/include/linux/kernfs.h
> index 367044d7708c..657eea1395b6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernfs.h
> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ enum kernfs_node_flag {
> KERNFS_SUICIDED = 0x0800,
> KERNFS_EMPTY_DIR = 0x1000,
> KERNFS_HAS_RELEASE = 0x2000,
> + KERNFS_REMOVING = 0x4000,
> };
>
> /* @flags for kernfs_create_root() */
> @@ -429,6 +430,7 @@ struct kernfs_node *kernfs_create_link(struct kernfs_node *parent,
> const char *name,
> struct kernfs_node *target);
> void kernfs_activate(struct kernfs_node *kn);
> +void kernfs_deactivate(struct kernfs_node *kn);
> void kernfs_remove(struct kernfs_node *kn);
> void kernfs_break_active_protection(struct kernfs_node *kn);
> void kernfs_unbreak_active_protection(struct kernfs_node *kn);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-23 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-20 0:05 [PATCHSET for-6.1] kernfs, cgroup: implement kernfs_deactivate() and cgroup_file_show() Tejun Heo
2022-08-20 0:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] kernfs: Simply by replacing kernfs_deref_open_node() with of_on() Tejun Heo
2022-08-23 5:15 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-08-20 0:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] kernfs: Drop unnecessary "mutex" local variable initialization Tejun Heo
2022-08-23 5:15 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-08-20 0:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] kernfs: Refactor kernfs_get_open_node() Tejun Heo
2022-08-23 5:16 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-08-20 0:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] kernfs: Skip kernfs_drain_open_files() more aggressively Tejun Heo
2022-08-23 5:27 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-08-23 19:37 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-25 12:11 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-08-20 0:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] kernfs: Make kernfs_drain() skip draining " Tejun Heo
2022-08-23 5:33 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-08-20 0:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] kernfs: Allow kernfs nodes to be deactivated and re-activated Tejun Heo
2022-08-23 5:49 ` Chengming Zhou [this message]
2022-08-23 20:31 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-20 0:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] cgroup: Implement cgroup_file_show() Tejun Heo
2022-08-22 1:58 ` [PATCHSET for-6.1] kernfs, cgroup: implement kernfs_deactivate() and cgroup_file_show() Chengming Zhou
2022-08-22 7:10 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d918a1f5-40f4-c90c-a7f5-720dcfddb89b@bytedance.com \
--to=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®