From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: use WP GPIO in sdhci_check_ro()
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:59:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d92a5588-ffdd-5198-b985-04d9b8dae601@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190115162837.5399-2-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
On 15/01/19 6:28 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Even though SDHCI controllers may have a dedicated WP pin that can be
> queried using the SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE register, some platforms may
> chose to use a separate regular GPIO to route the WP signal. Such a
> GPIO is typically represented using the wp-gpios property in the
> Device Tree.
>
> Unfortunately, the current sdhci_check_ro() function does not make use
> of such GPIO when available: it either uses a host controller specific
> ->get_ro() operation, or uses the SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE. Several host
> controller specific ->get_ro() functions are implemented just to use
> check a WP GPIO state.
>
> Instead of pushing this to more controller-specific implementations,
> let's handle this in the core SDHCI code, just like it is already done
> for the CD GPIO in sdhci_get_cd().
>
> The below patch simply changes sdhci_check_ro() to use the value of
> the WP GPIO if available. We need to adjust the prototype of the
> function to use a mmc_host* as argument instead of sdhci_host*, since
> the mmc_can_gpio_ro() and mmc_gpio_get_ro() helpers take a mmc_host*.
Why not just use host->mmc
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index df05352b6a4a..63cc4bd033b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2022,8 +2022,9 @@ static int sdhci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> return !!(sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) & SDHCI_CARD_PRESENT);
> }
>
> -static int sdhci_check_ro(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +static int sdhci_check_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> {
> + struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> unsigned long flags;
> int is_readonly;
>
> @@ -2031,6 +2032,8 @@ static int sdhci_check_ro(struct sdhci_host *host)
>
> if (host->flags & SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD)
> is_readonly = 0;
> + else if (mmc_can_gpio_ro(mmc))
> + is_readonly = mmc_gpio_get_ro(mmc);
Perhaps host->ops->get_ro should be checked before mmc_can_gpio_ro()?
> else if (host->ops->get_ro)
> is_readonly = host->ops->get_ro(host);
> else
> @@ -2052,11 +2055,11 @@ static int sdhci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> int i, ro_count;
>
> if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_UNSTABLE_RO_DETECT))
> - return sdhci_check_ro(host);
> + return sdhci_check_ro(mmc);
>
> ro_count = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < SAMPLE_COUNT; i++) {
> - if (sdhci_check_ro(host)) {
> + if (sdhci_check_ro(mmc)) {
> if (++ro_count > SAMPLE_COUNT / 2)
> return 1;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-16 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-15 16:28 [PATCH 0/3] Introduce support for WP GPIO in the core SDHCI Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-15 16:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: use WP GPIO in sdhci_check_ro() Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-16 12:32 ` Thierry Reding
2019-01-16 12:59 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2019-01-16 13:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-15 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-omap: drop ->get_ro() implementation Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-16 13:27 ` Thierry Reding
2019-01-16 15:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-01-16 15:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-18 10:57 ` Faiz Abbas
2019-01-18 15:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-01-15 16:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci-tegra: " Thomas Petazzoni
2019-01-16 13:22 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d92a5588-ffdd-5198-b985-04d9b8dae601@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome