From: Roman Yeryomin <roman@advem.lv>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [1/2] RTC: Add core rtc support for Gemini Soc devices
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 19:21:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d97c3a8a29aa85c83973daf4a22ca4c9@advem.lv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150506095312.GU4276@piout.net>
On 2015-05-06 12:53, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 at 11:39:58 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>> On Saturday 02 May 2015 01:42:14 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 14/12/2010 at 16:08:26 +0100, Hans Ulli Kroll wrote :
>> > > driver for the rtc device
>> > > on Cortina Systems CS3516 or StormlinkSemi SL3516 aka Gemini SoC
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>
>> >
>> > This driver has never been merged and the platform doesn't seem to be
>> > active anymore. Is there still any interest in getting this driver
>> > mainlined?
>> >
>> > Only tree wide cleanups happened in mach-gemini since end of 2010, the
>> > listed git repository (git://git.berlios.de/gemini-board) was on berliOS
>> > (closed since 2011) and the sourceforge mirror seems empty. Is there
>> > still interest in keeping that platform in the mainline?
>>
>> As far as I know, the platform is still used by a number of people,
>> and is supported by OpenWRT. The reason we haven't seen updates is
>> that
>> Ulli has been mostly absent from upstream development, and we haven't
>> had any other person step up as maintainer.
>>
>> I have a patch to convert the platform to ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM, and
>> the code doesn't really get in the way otherwise.
>>
>> As far as I'm concerned, we should just merge all the patches from
>> http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=tree;f=target/linux/gemini/patches-3.18
>>
>> We should also try to find a maintainer that can respond to patches
>> in a timely manner. If Ulli has time for that again, that would be
>> great,
>> otherwise I think we should find someone from OpenWRT to take over.
>>
>
> Thanks to point that, I'll merge that one which seems clean enough:
> http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=blob;f=target/linux/gemini/files/drivers/rtc/rtc-gemini.c;h=587d8122b2fbb1230437eadcce4789a53aa60ee5;hb=4c637410a2a1ab45988e8ca6202554a502102039
For 3.18 (and up) to work on gemini 160-gemini-timers.patch is vital.
Without that timers are broken and cpu is super slow.
Regards,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-14 15:08 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: Gemini: add RTC support for Gemini SoC Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-14 15:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] RTC: Add core rtc support for Gemini Soc devices Hans Ulli Kroll
2015-05-01 23:42 ` [1/2] " Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-06 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-06 9:53 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-06 16:21 ` Roman Yeryomin [this message]
2015-05-06 19:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-07 9:03 ` Roman Yeryomin
2015-05-07 17:35 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2015-05-07 21:31 ` Roman Yeryomin
2015-05-08 16:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-07-08 22:29 ` Roman Yeryomin
2015-07-09 8:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-07-09 11:58 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2015-07-09 13:02 ` Gemini Soc timers Roman Yeryomin
2015-07-09 15:48 ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-09 16:48 ` Roman Yeryomin
2015-07-10 8:48 ` Linus Walleij
2015-07-12 21:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-07-09 16:51 ` [1/2] RTC: Add core rtc support for Gemini Soc devices Roman Yeryomin
2015-07-19 16:28 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2015-05-07 3:00 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2015-05-07 7:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-07 17:46 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2015-05-07 21:35 ` Roman Yeryomin
2015-05-08 18:28 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-14 15:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Gemini: add platform support for Gemini RTC Hans Ulli Kroll
2011-01-07 9:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] ARM: Gemini: add RTC support for Gemini SoC Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-07 14:47 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2011-01-19 11:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d97c3a8a29aa85c83973daf4a22ca4c9@advem.lv \
--to=roman@advem.lv \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=ulli.kroll@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®