From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
<benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rpmsg: virtio_rpmsg_bus: Fix rpmsg_remove() release order
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:32:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9b7192b-2fc7-664f-d9a5-b90c8644b991@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532552826-30003-1-git-send-email-loic.pallardy@st.com>
Hi Loic,
On 07/25/2018 04:07 PM, Loic Pallardy wrote:
> In rpmsg_remove() procedure, children are removed then Name
> Service announcement endpoint is destroyed and device released.
>
> Issue with current implementation is if a NS announcement
> creation request is ongoing (received before virtio reset),
> child device could be created after children removing.
> In that case rpmsg_remove() is freeing rpmsg_virtio_bus,
> leading to an inconsistent state.
>
> This patch is destroying NS announcement service endpoint before
> removing children to guarantee that list of child devices is
> fixed and all of them will be correctly removed before cleaning
> resources.
I do not think this is the right fix for the problem you explained.
The removal of rpmsg devices can actually invoke the announce_destroy
in the rpmsg_dev_remove().
regards
Suman
>
> fixes: bcabbccabffe ("rpmsg: Split off generic tail of create_channel()")
>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> index 664f957..f5d481f 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> @@ -1004,13 +1004,13 @@ static void rpmsg_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>
> vdev->config->reset(vdev);
>
> + if (vrp->ns_ept)
> + __rpmsg_destroy_ept(vrp, vrp->ns_ept);
> +
> ret = device_for_each_child(&vdev->dev, NULL, rpmsg_remove_device);
> if (ret)
> dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "can't remove rpmsg device: %d\n", ret);
>
> - if (vrp->ns_ept)
> - __rpmsg_destroy_ept(vrp, vrp->ns_ept);
> -
> idr_destroy(&vrp->endpoints);
>
> vdev->config->del_vqs(vrp->vdev);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-25 21:07 Loic Pallardy
2018-07-25 22:32 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2018-07-26 7:09 ` Loic PALLARDY
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d9b7192b-2fc7-664f-d9a5-b90c8644b991@ti.com \
--to=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®