From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: Skip 200 ms debounce delay for Marvell 88SE9235
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:58:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9c4e80e-87ca-9e68-f97d-d2c709e54ff3@molgen.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ef3e995-3f61-ef53-0d5e-03bb41a52624@opensource.wdc.com>
Dear Damien,
Thank you for the quick reply.
Am 28.01.22 um 00:40 schrieb Damien Le Moal:
> On 1/28/22 08:35, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> The 200 ms delay before debouncing the PHY in `sata_link_resume()` is
>> not needed for the Marvell 88SE9235.
>>
>> $ lspci -nn -s 0021:0e:00.0
>> 0021:0e:00.0 SATA controller [0106]: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9235 PCIe 2.0 x2 4-port SATA 6 Gb/s Controller [1b4b:9235] (rev 11)
>>
>> So, remove it. Tested on IBM S822LC with current Linux 5.17-rc1:
>>
>> Without this patch (with 200 ms delay):
>>
>> [ 3.358158] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x3fe881000000 port 0x3fe881000100 irq 39
>> [ 3.358175] ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x3fe881000000 port 0x3fe881000180 irq 39
>> [ 3.358191] ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x3fe881000000 port 0x3fe881000200 irq 39
>> [ 3.358207] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x3fe881000000 port 0x3fe881000280 irq 39
>> […]
>> [ 3.677542] ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> [ 3.677719] ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> [ 3.839242] ata2: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>> [ 3.839828] ata2.00: ATA-10: ST1000NX0313 00LY266 00LY265IBM, BE33, max UDMA/133
>> [ 3.840029] ata2.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 32), AA
>> [ 3.841796] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>> [ 3.843231] ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>> [ 3.844083] ata1.00: ATA-10: ST1000NX0313 00LY266 00LY265IBM, BE33, max UDMA/133
>> [ 3.844313] ata1.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 32), AA
>> [ 3.846043] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>
>> With patch (no delay):
>>
>> [ 3.624259] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x3fe881000000 port 0x3f e881000100 irq 39
>> [ 3.624436] ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x3fe881000000 port 0x3f e881000180 irq 39
>> [ 3.624452] ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x3fe881000000 port 0x3f e881000200 irq 39
>> [ 3.624468] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0x3fe881000000 port 0x3f e881000280 irq 39
>> […]
>> [ 3.731966] ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> [ 3.732069] ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> [ 3.897448] ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>> [ 3.897678] ata2: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>> [ 3.898140] ata1.00: ATA-10: ST1000NX0313 00LY266 00LY265IBM, BE33, max UDMA/133
>> [ 3.898175] ata2.00: ATA-10: ST1000NX0313 00LY266 00LY265IBM, BE33, max UDMA/133
>> [ 3.898287] ata1.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 32), AA
>> [ 3.898349] ata2.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 32), AA
>> [ 3.900070] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>> [ 3.900166] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
>> index ab5811ef5a53..edca4e8fd44e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
>> @@ -582,6 +582,8 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = {
>> .driver_data = board_ahci_yes_fbs },
>> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL_EXT, 0x9230),
>> .driver_data = board_ahci_yes_fbs },
>> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL_EXT, 0x9235),
>> + .driver_data = board_ahci_no_debounce_delay },
>> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TTI, 0x0642), /* highpoint rocketraid 642L */
>> .driver_data = board_ahci_yes_fbs },
>> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TTI, 0x0645), /* highpoint rocketraid 644L */
>
> Looks good. But for the commit message, instead of the dmesg copy-paste,
> could you simply write the gains in terms of shortened scan time ? That
> would make it easier to understand the benefits of the patch.
I can do:
> Tested on IBM S822LC with current Linux 5.17-rc1, and the 200 ms is
> gone, and the drives are still detected.
I would still like to keep the Linux logs, as then it’s clear what I
tested with (drives), and what ports were populated.
> Also, there is no need for the lspci output.
In my opinion, it prooves I used the correct PCI vendor and device
codes, and also shows the revision number of the device I tested with.
Kind regards,
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 23:35 Paul Menzel
2022-01-27 23:40 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-28 9:58 ` Paul Menzel [this message]
2022-01-28 10:04 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-31 19:54 Paul Menzel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d9c4e80e-87ca-9e68-f97d-d2c709e54ff3@molgen.mpg.de \
--to=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®