From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F8D46BA; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 02:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719196005; cv=none; b=UEz+75x6TszHuPLrhaocYuun24xMywuZwuPeVXxnbmXDUEcke3B3J6/wo2angqAZvjqZLBxiGaPOMrUWktKuC6F93rhK5JO2Z8aedrdbuRiYKn4OIQV2oIKeTMmIgaH9lfq3od31v4iTQwWP/W7Rmdju5L9dAVAaYfy0YqZTJj4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719196005; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VF6ss1E9xCanAEWNpbP5BdN9LJRvLeanmOYgYq+Fq4U=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Y3QD8BJ7PxfEsw32Bddb0jCdq6KbkLgE4xoQ2Pc00IB4HRQhcfEglvMKz4XODjKGVOqGfZZT9Qe2OY93W0YauiYJ6AHM3ykJ4cWvXh1IKLAPMM7zHBh4yKDoq34q4LLt2lmjI4rvI2QjwfLDjtrfhNsucTixnJU2vaUGOAPZP2U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.48]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4W6sDP5dnlzxTFc; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:22:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500002.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.57]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043F718007C; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:26:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.247] (10.174.178.247) by dggpemf500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:26:29 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add ACPI NUMA support for RISC-V To: Haibo Xu , , CC: , , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Huacai Chen , WANG Xuerui , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Conor Dooley , Andrew Morton , Charlie Jenkins , Baoquan He , Evan Green , =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgTMOpZ2Vy?= , Zong Li , Sami Tolvanen , Alexandre Ghiti , Samuel Holland , Chen Jiahao , "Russell King (Oracle)" , Jisheng Zhang , James Morse , Andy Chiu , Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Tony Luck , Ard Biesheuvel , Dan Williams , Alison Schofield , Jonathan Cameron , Robert Richter , Yuntao Wang , Dave Jiang , , , , , References: From: Hanjun Guo Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:26:28 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpemf500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.57) On 2024/6/13 16:54, Haibo Xu wrote: > This patch series enable RISC-V ACPI NUMA support which was based on > the recently approved ACPI ECR[1]. > > Patch 1/4 add RISC-V specific acpi_numa.c file to parse NUMA information > from SRAT and SLIT ACPI tables. > Patch 2/4 add the common SRAT RINTC affinity structure handler. > Patch 3/4 change the ACPI_NUMA to a hidden option since it would be selected > by default on all supported platform. > Patch 4/4 replace pr_info with pr_debug in arch_acpi_numa_init() to avoid > potential boot noise on ACPI platforms that are not NUMA. Looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo