From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422857AbXD3XIN (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:08:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422943AbXD3XIN (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:08:13 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.232]:41756 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422857AbXD3XIL (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:08:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SOH91Xg7+x1h+PKuphfq4K7itw4c1gzTs6EAjB1WaBFDVyH8kb6He1y5EG7eYx9CRQsO1ge7Up10ITxapWdkb8IMXGhv6QBtb2uPB5OwslcVQa5JbaInhEB7Rar+8AViFDQ9cttpAmEUtpj5hWQUlyFuVuERnazhzykDvWEepcA= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 01:08:09 +0200 From: "Markus Rechberger" To: "Manu Abraham" Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities Cc: "Trent Piepho" , "Michael Krufky" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Linus Torvalds" , "Linux Kernel Mailing list" , "Linux DVB" In-Reply-To: <463674A9.9040100@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070429182209.267430@gmx.net> <20070429205925.129920@gmx.net> <20070429230037.95120@gmx.net> <463674A9.9040100@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/1/07, Manu Abraham wrote: > Trent Piepho wrote: > > > The issue with dst is just a minor missing feature to fully support the > dvb > > helper module customization system. So nobody needs to worry about this > > anymore, the last two patches in this repository will fix it correctly. > > With regards to the dst, i have explained earlier to you that > > 1) the dst is not a frontend > 2) i do not wish to use the frontend attach methods with regards to > dst/dst_ca > > To mention, we had these discussions much long back how to go about it > and don't think that every time a new developer get's an account with > linuxtv.org, this has to be a matter that has to discussed to death > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.dvb/16156/match=patch+dvb+bt8xx+cleanup > > (eventhough of not much concern) If you now see most of the code in > dvb-bt8xx especially the DMA stuff was refactored from the dst driver. > > But that said, the dst *is* different, so WTH ? > Please show me where this change makes your work more difficult, Trent's change is small and I don't see the problem where it seriously affects your work. Markus