mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	 Frederic Weisbecker	 <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Waiman Long	 <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migation
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:17:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9e3238e78a0384a6ba0651574522f44c6f2fb76.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250530142031.215594-1-gmonaco@redhat.com>

On Fri, 2025-05-30 at 16:20 +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> The timer migration mechanism allows active CPUs to pull timers from
> idle ones to improve the overall idle time. This is however undesired
> when CPU intensive workloads run on isolated cores, as the algorithm
> would move the timers from housekeeping to isolated cores, negatively
> affecting the isolation.
> 
> [...]
> 
> Exclude isolated cores from the timer migration algorithm, extend the
> concept of unavailable cores, currently used for offline ones, to
> isolated ones:
> * A core is unavailable if isolated or offline;
> * A core is available if isolated and offline;
> 
> A core is considered unavailable as isolated if it belongs to:
> * the isolcpus (domain) list
> * an isolated cpuset
> Except if it is:
> * in the nohz_full list (already idle for the hierarchy)
> * the nohz timekeeper core (must be available to handle global
> timers)

Frederic, Thomas, Waiman, would you have time to review this series?
Thanks,
Gabriele

> 
> Due to how the timer migration algorithm works, any CPU part of the
> hierarchy can have their global timers pulled by remote CPUs and have
> to
> pull remote timers, only skipping pulling remote timers would break
> the
> logic.
> For this reason, we prevent isolated CPUs from pulling remote global
> timers, but also the other way around: any global timer started on an
> isolated CPU will run there. This does not break the concept of
> isolation (global timers don't come from outside the CPU) and, if
> considered inappropriate, can usually be mitigated with other
> isolation
> techniques (e.g. IRQ pinning).
> 
> The first 3 patches are preparatory work to change the concept of
> online/offline to available/unavailable, keep track of those in a
> separate cpumask and change a function name in cpuset code.
> 
> Patch 4 and 5 adapt isolation and cpuset to prevent domain isolated
> and
> nohz_full from covering all CPUs not leaving any housekeeping one.
> This
> can lead to problems with the changes introduced in this series
> because
> no CPU would remain to handle global timers.
> 
> Patch 6 extends the unavailable status to domain isolated CPUs, which
> is the main contribution of the series.
> 
> Changes since v5:
> * Remove fallback if no housekeeping is left by isolcpus and
> nohz_full
> * Adjust condition not to activate CPUs in the migration hierarchy
> * Always force the nohz tick CPU active in the hierarchy
> 
> Changes since v4 [1]:
> * use on_each_cpu_mask() with changes on isolated CPUs to avoid races
> * keep nohz_full CPUs included in the timer migration hierarchy
> * prevent domain isolated and nohz_full to cover all CPUs
> 
> Changes since v3:
> * add parameter to function documentation
> * split into multiple straightforward patches
> 
> Changes since v2:
> * improve comments about handling CPUs isolated at boot
> * minor cleanup
> 
> Changes since v1 [2]:
> * split into smaller patches
> * use available mask instead of unavailable
> * simplification and cleanup
> 
> [1] -
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250506091534.42117-7-gmonaco@redhat.com
> [2] -
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250410065446.57304-2-gmonaco@redhat.com
> 
> Gabriele Monaco (6):
>   timers: Rename tmigr 'online' bit to 'available'
>   timers: Add the available mask in timer migration
>   cgroup/cpuset: Rename update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask() to
>     update_exclusion_cpumasks()
>   sched/isolation: Force housekeeping if isolcpus and nohz_full don't
>     leave any
>   cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any
>     housekeeping
>   timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migation
> 
>  include/linux/timer.h                  |  9 +++
>  include/trace/events/timer_migration.h |  4 +-
>  kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c                 | 71 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/sched/isolation.c               | 12 ++++
>  kernel/time/timer_migration.c          | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> --
>  kernel/time/timer_migration.h          |  2 +-
>  6 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: 0ff41df1cb268fc69e703a08a57ee14ae967d0ca


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-18 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-30 14:20 Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-30 14:20 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] timers: Rename tmigr 'online' bit to 'available' Gabriele Monaco
2025-06-20 17:04   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-30 14:20 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] timers: Add the available mask in timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-30 14:20 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Rename update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask() to update_exclusion_cpumasks() Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-30 14:20 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] sched/isolation: Force housekeeping if isolcpus and nohz_full don't leave any Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-30 14:20 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping Gabriele Monaco
2025-05-30 14:20 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migation Gabriele Monaco
2025-06-20 17:00   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-06-24  8:05     ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-06-24 13:20       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-06-24 14:06         ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-06-24 14:52           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-06-25 10:45             ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-06-25 13:16               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-06-25 13:46                 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-06-25 14:42                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-06-18 12:17 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2025-06-18 12:22   ` [PATCH v6 0/6] " Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9e3238e78a0384a6ba0651574522f44c6f2fb76.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®