From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-99.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-99.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755658462 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 03:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.99 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744081638; cv=none; b=MPlCFCN+wpyVeuYj8Ruuoj078bU6CmKjetnz61+6IZdeocEgavagh7opqC3wTsNrL8I39F+fsTfFHpfXItZhmvZEHkpgtzN7A9QmcvA8/U00vqGm5OLqoDrsGM2yJnbWRSy5O0uVcoNMfJ3407jTPQ2Telh1vSk+JYgKIpo0D1U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744081638; c=relaxed/simple; bh=96ySzd9iFoP4DX1zWwjf1BpV/FabtP5cNLJzoMll5sA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=N85uZ4Mm9zra2yvcu4KdoodY3ygnCODeV4PzHfjvwS2mtxBEYlucjdvWfNSCpnbzJKfM8NJVgg4Vie0EJeblOU5MRT0Q+FKs/VHX3EVqdlEXBDL+WZqi9Vgca1e/tlnzIs9f4EefcX3qNOfjv0VPIvrA+XxhlCED2Qk7XKUHYL0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=uCj/PDvy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.99 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="uCj/PDvy" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1744081633; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=7/qcQmc8TlRDaeREPlCChF/VdJV1qOYf2bxSgnptYUE=; b=uCj/PDvyB1ENcICtmR5v/b5mlI8BQfAmf5SwWOt/3xPC5/eFuH8W9nom9KrP7P+1pNuL/NGY4+t0SB0W+WDzjCHxgDJZFgqy9ueaW+ivMyGbOQFTwCz3xVbAjA9idtidd/dxKbizNha6XOOioaeiNe06DJPu/1R9HqxAS1oMWMA= Received: from 30.74.129.179(mailfrom:hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WWB03J1_1744081632 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 11:07:12 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:07:11 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] erofs: lazily initialize per-CPU workers and CPU hotplug hooks To: Sandeep Dhavale , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Gao Xiang , Chao Yu , Yue Hu , Jeffle Xu Cc: kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250402202728.2157627-1-dhavale@google.com> From: Gao Xiang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Sandeep, On 2025/4/8 10:53, Sandeep Dhavale wrote: > Hi, > Gentle ping for review in case this slipped through the list. I'm working on internal stuffs (unrelated to erofs, currently I have to handle erofs stuffs totally in my spare time), also does it really need to be resolved now? It's not like a bugfix, if it's not urgent it will be landed upstream in the next merge window. Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Thanks, > Sandeep.