From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
To: Maxim Korotkov <korotkov.maxim.s@gmail.com>,
Kenneth Chan <kenneth.t.chan@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
Ivan Kapranov <i.kapranov@securitycode.ru>,
lvc-project@linuxtesting.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: fix NULL dereference
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 01:21:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da442a04-9db8-4951-98b4-3e149ea06415@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240328103518.169604-1-korotkov.maxim.s@gmail.com>
Am 28.03.24 um 11:35 schrieb Maxim Korotkov:
> When initializing the pcc by calling acpi_driver_data(), the "device"
> pointer was dereferenced without checking for NULL. This seems like
> a logical mistake.
>
> Added a pointer check to ensure that it is valid
> before using it for pcc initialization.
Hi,
is this check even needed? I think the ACPI driver core takes care
of passing a valid ACPI device pointer to acpi_pcc_hotkey_remove().
Thanks,
Armin Wolf
> Found by Security Code and Linux Verification Center(linuxtesting.org)
>
> Fixes: 709ee531c153 ("panasonic-laptop: add Panasonic Let's Note laptop extras driver v0.94")
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Korotkov <korotkov.maxim.s@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c
> index cf845ee1c7b1..de29758b0384 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c
> @@ -1067,9 +1067,12 @@ static int acpi_pcc_hotkey_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>
> static void acpi_pcc_hotkey_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> {
> - struct pcc_acpi *pcc = acpi_driver_data(device);
> + struct pcc_acpi *pcc;
>
> - if (!device || !pcc)
> + if (!device)
> + return;
> + pcc = acpi_driver_data(device);
> + if (!pcc)
> return;
>
> i8042_remove_filter(panasonic_i8042_filter);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-29 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 10:35 Maxim Korotkov
2024-03-28 21:53 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-03-29 0:21 ` Armin Wolf [this message]
2024-03-29 8:20 ` Maxim Korotkov
2024-03-29 18:44 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-04-02 12:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da442a04-9db8-4951-98b4-3e149ea06415@gmx.de \
--to=w_armin@gmx.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=i.kapranov@securitycode.ru \
--cc=kenneth.t.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=korotkov.maxim.s@gmail.com \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®