mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: "Łukasz Patron" <priv.luk@gmail.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	 dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm: Implement set_read_only
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 19:52:05 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da447e8f-0068-d847-b712-47081fa9f2e7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240821213048.726082-1-priv.luk@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1649 bytes --]



On Wed, 21 Aug 2024, Łukasz Patron wrote:

> This lets us change the read-only flag for device mapper block devices
> via the BLKROSET ioctl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Łukasz Patron <priv.luk@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index 87bb90303435..538a93e596d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,12 @@ static int dm_blk_getgeo(struct block_device *bdev, struct hd_geometry *geo)
>  	return dm_get_geometry(md, geo);
>  }
>  
> +static int dm_blk_set_read_only(struct block_device *bdev, bool ro)
> +{
> +	set_disk_ro(bdev->bd_disk, ro);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int dm_prepare_ioctl(struct mapped_device *md, int *srcu_idx,
>  			    struct block_device **bdev)
>  {
> @@ -3666,6 +3672,7 @@ static const struct block_device_operations dm_blk_dops = {
>  	.release = dm_blk_close,
>  	.ioctl = dm_blk_ioctl,
>  	.getgeo = dm_blk_getgeo,
> +	.set_read_only = dm_blk_set_read_only,
>  	.report_zones = dm_blk_report_zones,
>  	.pr_ops = &dm_pr_ops,
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE
> -- 
> 2.46.0

Hi

Device mapper already calls set_disk_ro in the do_resume function. So, the 
problem here is that the value set using set_read_only will be overwritten 
as soon as a new table will be loaded.

I'd like to ask why is this patch needed? Why do you want to set read-only 
status using this ioctl instead of using the existing table flag?

If this is needed, we need to add another flag that is being set by 
dm_blk_set_read_only, so that dm_blk_set_read_only and dm_resume won't 
step over each other's changes.

Mikulas

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-27 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-21 21:30 Łukasz Patron
2024-08-27 17:52 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2024-08-28  9:21   ` Łukasz Patron
2024-08-28 13:49     ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da447e8f-0068-d847-b712-47081fa9f2e7@redhat.com \
    --to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=priv.luk@gmail.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®