From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D345226E15A; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739895373; cv=none; b=jEcJAHRELtwaoPCxVWaRZyeQf1+CvkwKLUCHD8FPbI69Y0vrmX3Clp74Ti/EdySfpx7ltTJoyRGEBDzSsCFJC8SWjGvVzybLdNI8GvoC97OUvs8zF9NV8zSRNReKKqEUg3UME/M6EIGk65DG5ejxtdhUKb1gwTZAnn071o9qSxk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739895373; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0MOKGvsPRSG1U618hGedCatAETAqCMPW9NYg828vZb4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GqJGbsciHj/Nwp0v1ZD3yw/K51RPMHDbM6AbpAxykBKX2zUBlbUGP3GjZDSUfLkA/PoNY04xq0qfm0jhyy9DNSWlSgzZkKuwzbHqDD7pOPN7vDWgBlnOJMkP/doFe4Df4kiVcWwOpxSQ1acJyEq7Xx7I0S1BzGMv7v2YG64p6HM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=Q+/BuoE+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="Q+/BuoE+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=7CW4v4AoHa6ABcgvmCbVdRqCmm5FyrKaem/pFda21aQ=; b=Q+/BuoE+1urhxGFcvtl35FVsxq S6wbn84edysVF5aBP5POmy5hFKja8DXTSGp0ryQrLMhEF+LaPD3lf3JAtrn89xZCWuP7i2vnQHmVz RbZO0rMdpIDeE8JpcQTYEWqOADi0Ecjwn77kqHQg9NsCpHNBsRd1PaimO6xJIRvm8pB8=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tkQGV-00FLaL-3P; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:16:07 +0100 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:16:07 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Sean Anderson Cc: "Gupta, Suraj" , "Pandey, Radhey Shyam" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paolo Abeni , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "Simek, Michal" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Eric Dumazet , Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: xilinx: axienet: Implement BQL Message-ID: References: <20250214211252.2615573-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > > Could you please check if BQL can be implemented for DMAengine flow? > > I can have a look, but TBH I do not test the dma engine configuration since it is > so much slower. It might actually benefit more from BQL if it is slower? Andrew