Re: [PATCH] rseq/selftests: fix parametrized test with -fpie

[Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>]

On 09/27/2018 12:10 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 09/27/2018 12:02 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> ----- On Sep 27, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Shuah Khan shuah.kh@samsung.com wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/27/2018 07:22 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
>>>> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ----- On Sep 18, 2018, at 9:53 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>>>>> mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On x86-64, the parametrized selftest code for rseq crashes with a
>>>>>> segmentation fault when compiled with -fpie. This happens when the
>>>>>> param_test binary is loaded at an address beyond 32-bit on x86-64.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The issue is caused by use of a 32-bit register to hold the address
>>>>>> of the loop counter variable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fix this by using a 64-bit register to calculate the address of the
>>>>>> loop counter variables as an offset from rip.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should this fix go through tip or the selftests tree ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I usually have changes like this pulled through Shuah's tree with an
>>>> ack from the maintainer of the code that it tests.
>>>>
>>>> -- Steve
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right that is what I prefer. I usually wait for an Ack. I can pull this
>>> in.
>>
>> I am maintainer of the code that it tests as well, so being both author
>> of the selftest patch and giving an ack to it seems a bit silly. :) Other
>> rseq co-maintainers could weight in though: Peter, Paul, and Boqun.
>>
> 
> I was commenting in general, not specific to this patch. No worries. I will
> apply this right away.
> 
> I have been traveling the last couple of weeks and in the catch up mode still.
> 

Hmm. this patch doesn't apply to linux-kselftest fixes branch which is at 4.19-rc4.
Also you don't have my current email from getmaintainers.

Could you please rebase and send it to me.

thanks,
-- Shuah