From: "Grant Grundler" <grundler@google.com>
To: "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: ksummit-2008-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] KS Topic Proposal: Vendor and User problems with the Kernel
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:53:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da824cf30806270953q1ebe62fx4face15e12edcc99@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1214583706.3394.58.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:21 AM, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> This proposal is a bit different from a concrete topic, but it's based
> on the generally positive feedback from the end user panel last year.
> It's to allocate 2h of Kernel summit to discuss problems raised by
> vendors and end users. The format I'm proposing is 10 minutes of
> problem introduction by someone from the vendor or user representative
> who is a subject matter expert and 20 minutes of discussion (so,
> hopefully four such problems).
>
> As usual, the difficulty is actually finding people from the vendor and
> user community willing to do such a presentation (and ensuring they
> won't simply want to talk about their problems with X distro enterprise
> kernels). The way I think we might get some diverse problems is to send
> out a call for participation.
I think this is a good idea and I suggest using referrals since it's not
just about the problem. It's also how it's presented. And it would be
worth a few $K to pay for a good presenter who has something relevant
to say. e.g. enough to cover travel/hotel plus something extra.
Secondly, these problems arise because second tier users aren't
participating in the development. I see this CFP as a "Call For Participation"
and not a "call for papers".
I also suggest trying to get representatives from different communities.
e.g. education, handhelds, desktop (something other than gfx drivers,
maybe revisit the user visible latency issues), HPC, database, etc.
I left out "embedded" since that's now too vague, has been flogged
to death in the past, and I _hope_ now has better participation.
The last issue I see is "Vendor" usually means HW vendor with a few
major SW vendors (e.g. Oracle, SAP). Those guys have sufficient
representation and I think some newer, smaller players (e.g. not google)
would be more interesting to invite. Maybe dreamworks, pixar, or
Ernie Ball Guitar Strings (http://www.ernieball.com/) might be examples.
hth,
grant
> Something like.
>
> "The kernel summit programme committe is inviting proposals for
> participation in the 2008 Kernel Summit in Portland Oregon (URL) from
> members of the End User and Vendor communities wishing to raise
> particular issues or problems they see with the current Linux Kernel. A
> good problem presentation should stimulate discussion with the kernel
> community, and as such the presenter should be a subject matter expert
> capable of engaging in the debate. While the presenter may have a
> preferred solution, they should concentrate on the problem and be
> prepared to consider the effects of solutions outside of their preferred
> one. It goes without saying that problems should have a significant
> component which is susceptible to a solution within the Linux Kernel.
>
> "Proposals of around 500 words and describing the nature of the problem
> and the credentials of the presenter should be forwarded to the Linux
> Kernel Programme Committee at
> <ksummit-2008-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>"
>
> Obviously we'd have to circulate this beyond the usual mailing lists,
> but we can solicit help from the Linux Foundation to do this.
>
> James
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ksummit-2008-discuss mailing list
> Ksummit-2008-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-2008-discuss
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-27 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-27 16:21 James Bottomley
2008-06-27 16:53 ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2008-07-15 20:54 ` [Ksummit-2008-discuss] " James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da824cf30806270953q1ebe62fx4face15e12edcc99@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grundler@google.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ksummit-2008-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®