From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com,
qperret@google.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during migration
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:26:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daa01574-5d7b-c125-48a9-d1ec7bd1fb64@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211209161159.1596018-3-vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
On 09.12.21 17:11, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
[...]
> @@ -6899,6 +6899,14 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)
>
> static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
>
> +static u64 rq_clock_pelt_estimator(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> + u64 pelt_lag = sched_clock_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) -
> + u64_u32_load(rq->clock_pelt_lag);
> +
> + return cfs_rq_last_update_time(&rq->cfs) + pelt_lag;
Why do you use `avg.last_update_time` (lut) of the root cfs_rq here?
p's lut was just synced to cfs_rq_of(se)'s lut in
migrate_task_rq_fair() (1) -> remove_entity_load_avg() ->
sync_entity_load_avg(se) (2)
[...]
> @@ -6924,26 +6934,29 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
> * In case of TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING we in fact hold the 'old'
> * rq->lock and can modify state directly.
> */
> - lockdep_assert_rq_held(task_rq(p));
> - detach_entity_cfs_rq(&p->se);
> + lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> + detach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
>
> } else {
> + remove_entity_load_avg(se);
> +
> /*
> - * We are supposed to update the task to "current" time, then
> - * its up to date and ready to go to new CPU/cfs_rq. But we
> - * have difficulty in getting what current time is, so simply
> - * throw away the out-of-date time. This will result in the
> - * wakee task is less decayed, but giving the wakee more load
> - * sounds not bad.
> + * Here, the task's PELT values have been updated according to
> + * the current rq's clock. But if that clock hasn't been
> + * updated in a while, a substantial idle time will be missed,
> + * leading to an inflation after wake-up on the new rq.
> + *
> + * Estimate the PELT clock lag, and update sched_avg to ensure
> + * PELT continuity after migration.
> */
> - remove_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
> + __update_load_avg_blocked_se(rq_clock_pelt_estimator(rq), se);
We do __update_load_avg_blocked_se() now twice for p, 1. in (2) and then
in (1) again.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-20 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-09 16:11 [PATCH 0/4] feec() energy margin removal Vincent Donnefort
2021-12-09 16:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Provide u64 read for 32-bits arch helper Vincent Donnefort
2021-12-09 16:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Decay task PELT values during migration Vincent Donnefort
2021-12-20 11:26 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2021-12-20 16:09 ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-12-21 12:46 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-12-09 16:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Remove task_util from effective utilization in feec() Vincent Donnefort
2022-01-04 17:27 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-01-12 10:20 ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-12-09 16:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Remove the energy margin " Vincent Donnefort
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daa01574-5d7b-c125-48a9-d1ec7bd1fb64@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.donnefort@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®