Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Staging: fsl-mc: include: mc-bus: Kernel type 's16' preferred over 'int16_t'

[Shiva Kerdel <shiva@exdev.nl>]

Sorry for this misunderstanding,

Since received a response from Stuart on my previous patch telling me I 
was probably working on a out-of-date codebase,
I started to look where I did go wrong.

After some research I found out that I was always one step behind 
because I was developing on the actual Linux kernel branch instead
of using the Staging-next as my codebase.

He wrote me to sent the patches that still apply over again with a new 
version tag so that's why this patch only contains 2 of them.

I am still new at contributing to the Linux kernel and some things were 
not really clear to me at the beginning.
I hope that you could still use these patches and I am trying to avoid 
misunderstandings like these.

Do I still need to resend them and is there anything left for me to do 
with these?

Best regards,

Shiva Kerdel

On 11/10/16 13:24, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Shiva Kerdel wrote:
>> Follow the kernel type preferrences of using 's16' over 'int16_t'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shiva Kerdel <shiva@exdev.nl>
>> ---
>>   drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc-bus.h | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> What is different from your v1 patch?
>
> I'm confused now, I have two different series from you, one 6 patches
> long, and one 2 patches long, claiming to do the same thing.
>
> I've dropped them both from my patch review queue and please, resend
> what you really want me to apply :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h