From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
John Haxby <john.haxby@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: new kernel.ns_modules_allowed sysctl
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 10:33:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dae3f121-1a64-3b20-0e25-ffae724c0fac@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202208121146.9E4A98B@keescook>
On 8/12/22 20:48, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:25:17AM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>>
>> On 8/10/22 00:56, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:52:29PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>>>> Creating a new user namespace grants you the ability to reach a lot of code
>>>> (including loading certain kernel modules) that would otherwise be out of
>>>> reach of an attacker. We can reduce the attack surface and block exploits
>>>> by ensuring that user namespaces cannot trigger module (auto-)loading.
>>>>
[...]
> I agree, it'd be nice to have. I'm just trying to predict what kind of
> push-back there may be.
>
> Can you address the build failures noted on the thread, and send a v2?
Did just now:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220815082753.6088-1-vegard.nossum@oracle.com/
> I
> note that after this patch it looks like all module loading from a userns
> gets logged, regardless of the setting. Is that intended?
Yeah, I thought it was useful to know even when the sysctl was disabled
but I've removed it in v2 so the patch is less intrusive. I guess it can
always be added later if it actually serves a purpose.
Thanks,
Vegard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-15 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-09 18:52 Vegard Nossum
2022-08-09 22:56 ` Kees Cook
2022-08-10 8:25 ` Vegard Nossum
2022-08-12 18:48 ` Kees Cook
2022-08-15 8:33 ` Vegard Nossum [this message]
2022-08-10 21:54 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-10 23:35 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dae3f121-1a64-3b20-0e25-ffae724c0fac@oracle.com \
--to=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=cascardo@canonical.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=john.haxby@oracle.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®