From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: <od@zcrc.me>, <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] remoteproc: Add prepare/unprepare callbacks
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:31:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <daf58c35-c240-e50a-da50-48b14c0e097c@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200211142614.13567-3-paul@crapouillou.net>
Hi Paul,
I still wonder about the use of pm_runtime mechanism as a more generic alternative...
Else just a minor remark inline.
On 2/11/20 3:26 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> The .prepare() callback is called before the firmware is loaded to
> memory. This is useful for instance in the case where some setup is
> required for the memory to be accessible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2-v4: No change
> v5: Move calls to prepare/unprepare to rproc_fw_boot/rproc_shutdown
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index fe5c7a2f9767..022b927e176b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1373,6 +1373,14 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>
> dev_info(dev, "Booting fw image %s, size %zd\n", name, fw->size);
>
> + if (rproc->ops->prepare) {
> + ret = rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepare rproc: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /*
> * if enabling an IOMMU isn't relevant for this rproc, this is
> * just a nop
> @@ -1380,7 +1388,7 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> ret = rproc_enable_iommu(rproc);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "can't enable iommu: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> + goto unprepare_rproc;
> }
>
> rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
> @@ -1424,6 +1432,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> disable_iommu:
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> +unprepare_rproc:
> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
> + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1823,6 +1834,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>
> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
> + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
> +
> /* Free the copy of the resource table */
> kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 5f201f0c86c3..a6272d1ba384 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>
> /**
> * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
> + * @prepare: prepare the device for power up (before the firmware is loaded)
> + * @unprepare: unprepare the device after it is stopped
Would be nice here to precise that these functions are optional
you can look at rproc_ops struct for example.
Regards,
Arnaud
> * @start: power on the device and boot it
> * @stop: power off the device
> * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
> @@ -371,6 +373,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> * @get_boot_addr: get boot address to entry point specified in firmware
> */
> struct rproc_ops {
> + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> + void (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-18 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-11 14:26 [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: Document JZ47xx VPU auxiliary processor Paul Cercueil
2020-02-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] remoteproc: Add device-managed variants of rproc_alloc/rproc_add Paul Cercueil
2020-02-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] remoteproc: Add prepare/unprepare callbacks Paul Cercueil
2020-02-18 16:31 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2020-02-24 15:25 ` Paul Cercueil
2020-02-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] remoteproc: ingenic: Added remoteproc driver Paul Cercueil
2020-02-11 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as reviewer for Ingenic rproc driver Paul Cercueil
2020-02-12 2:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: Document JZ47xx VPU auxiliary processor Rob Herring
2020-02-12 2:07 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-12 2:08 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=daf58c35-c240-e50a-da50-48b14c0e097c@st.com \
--to=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=od@zcrc.me \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome