mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	avri.altman@sandisk.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	peter.wang@mediatek.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com,
	alice.chao@mediatek.com, cc.chou@mediatek.com,
	chaotian.jing@mediatek.com, tun-yu.yu@mediatek.com,
	naomi.chu@mediatek.com, ed.tsai@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18.y] scsi: ufs: core: Re-arm the device command completion before submitting
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 21:52:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <daily-reply-20260915-0008-re-ufs-dev-cmd-completion@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915052638.459390-1-alice.chao@mediatek.com>

> Re-arm the completion in ufshcd_issue_dev_cmd(), immediately before
> submitting. All submitters - ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(),
> ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd() and ufshcd_advanced_rpmb_op() - reach it
> holding hba->dev_cmd.lock, so no extra serialization is needed.

The analysis reads correct to me and the patch is clean against 6.18, but
this is a stable only change in the UFS core completion path with no
mainline counterpart, since 08b12cda6c44 ("scsi: ufs: core: Switch to
scsi_get_internal_cmd()") deleted this code outright. I would like a
subsystem ack before queueing it.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16  1:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-15  5:26 alice.chao
2026-09-16  1:52 ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=daily-reply-20260915-0008-re-ufs-dev-cmd-completion@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=alice.chao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@sandisk.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cc.chou@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ed.tsai@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=naomi.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tun-yu.yu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®