From: Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@oracle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org,
hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org,
sr@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/123] 5.15.196-rc1 review
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db391b96-131e-4daa-906b-c7be43f27ccf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025102912-cosmetics-reflector-ab4f@gregkh>
Hi Greg,
On 29/10/25 3:50 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 09:11:58PM +0530, Vijayendra Suman wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28/10/25 12:04 am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.196 release.
>>> There are 123 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 29 Oct 2025 18:34:15 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!IVHnCNGPANSvr6y0A-odHf0UE4PdtiY7sjGz2BlRApDAo-XoZrirsziXr5syGOL9x2-s6GjtEsk_yVSVuFc7OkW3YM4C$
>>> patch-5.15.196-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> perf failed to compile with following errors at compilation.
>>
>> BUILDSTDERR: tests/perf-record.c: In function 'test__PERF_RECORD':
>> BUILDSTDERR: tests/perf-record.c:118:17: error: implicit declaration of
>> function 'evlist__cancel_workload'; did you mean 'evlist__start_workload'?
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> BUILDSTDERR: 118 | evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
>> BUILDSTDERR: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> BUILDSTDERR: | evlist__start_workload
>>
>>
>> There is no definition for evlist__cancel_workload
>>
>> Following are references of 'evlist__cancel_workload'
>> tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c:118: evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
>> tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c:130: evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
>> tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c:142: evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
>> tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c:155: evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
>>
>>
>> Commit which need to be reverted.
>> b7e5c59f3b09 perf test: Don't leak workload gopipe in PERF_RECORD_*
>
> This is already being reverted in the latest -rc release, does that not
> work here for you?
I think saw, this error on v5.15.196-rc1, When I rechecked on
v5.15.196-rc2, It was fixed as "perf test: Don't leak workload gopipe in
PERF_RECORD_*" was reverted, had confirmed same on revert of rc2 release.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
thanks,
Vijay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 18:34 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-27 18:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 061/123] arm64, mm: avoid always making PTE dirty in pte_mkwrite() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-27 18:36 ` [PATCH 5.15 114/123] devcoredump: Fix circular locking dependency with devcd->mutex Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-27 21:01 ` [PATCH 5.15 000/123] 5.15.196-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
2025-10-27 23:26 ` Slade Watkins
2025-10-28 4:49 ` Ron Economos
2025-10-28 8:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-28 8:09 ` Pavel Machek
2025-10-28 11:28 ` Jon Hunter
2025-10-28 15:41 ` Vijayendra Suman
2025-10-29 10:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-30 18:30 ` Vijayendra Suman [this message]
2025-10-28 19:27 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db391b96-131e-4daa-906b-c7be43f27ccf@oracle.com \
--to=vijayendra.suman@oracle.com \
--cc=achill@achill.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hargar@microsoft.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sr@sladewatkins.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®