From: "zhangjianhua (E)" <chris.zjh@huawei.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
<joey.gouly@arm.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <bhe@redhat.com>,
<thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3] arm64: fix build warning for ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 14:39:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db4b23bb-c31c-b936-68c1-fbc54a2f4329@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce4e5bfa-6a98-4d5d-d91f-d91835010f71@arm.com>
在 2023/8/4 14:24, Anshuman Khandual 写道:
>
> On 8/3/23 22:36, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 08:24:04PM +0000, Zhang Jianhua wrote:
>>> When building with W=1, the following warning occurs.
>>>
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:129:41: error: "PUD_SHIFT" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Werror=undef]
>>> 129 | #define ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT PUD_SHIFT
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:142:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT’
>>> 142 | #if ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT < SECTION_SIZE_BITS
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> The reason is that PUD_SHIFT isn't defined if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3
>>> and CONFIG_VA_BITS == 39.
>> The correct description is that the generic PUD_SHIFT isn't defined for
>> asm files, we still have it defined for C files (there's an #ifndef
>> __ASSEMBLY__ guard).
> Agreed, please rework the commit message explaining how generic PUD_SHIFT
> definition is not available for assembly files, prompting this code block
> movement. CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3 with CONFIG_VA_BITS == 39 just help
> in exposing this problem.
No problem, I will send a new patch soon.
>>> Now move the macro ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT and
>>> ARM64_MEMSTART_ALIGN to arch/arm64/mm/init.c where it is used to avoid
>>> this issue, and also there is no other place to call these two macro.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com>
>> This fix works for me. I'll leave it to Will for 6.6 as apart from the
>> warning with W=1, there's no other issue (ARM64_MEMSTART_* are not used
>> in any asm files).
> Right, not real a problem to be fixed, this can wait till 6.6
>
>> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 20:24 Zhang Jianhua
2023-08-03 17:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-08-04 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-04 6:39 ` zhangjianhua (E) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db4b23bb-c31c-b936-68c1-fbc54a2f4329@huawei.com \
--to=chris.zjh@huawei.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®