mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
	Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: nSVM: Fix L1 state corruption upon return from SMM
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 13:32:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <db569845400963d057eedf063bba1599cb9ed77a.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210628104425.391276-5-vkuznets@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 12:44 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> VMCB split commit 4995a3685f1b ("KVM: SVM: Use a separate vmcb for the
> nested L2 guest") broke return from SMM when we entered there from guest
> (L2) mode. Gen2 WS2016/Hyper-V is known to do this on boot. The problem
> manifests itself like this:
> 
>   kvm_exit:             reason EXIT_RSM rip 0x7ffbb280 info 0 0
>   kvm_emulate_insn:     0:7ffbb280: 0f aa
>   kvm_smm_transition:   vcpu 0: leaving SMM, smbase 0x7ffb3000
>   kvm_nested_vmrun:     rip: 0x000000007ffbb280 vmcb: 0x0000000008224000
>     nrip: 0xffffffffffbbe119 int_ctl: 0x01020000 event_inj: 0x00000000
>     npt: on
>   kvm_nested_intercepts: cr_read: 0000 cr_write: 0010 excp: 40060002
>     intercepts: fd44bfeb 0000217f 00000000
>   kvm_entry:            vcpu 0, rip 0xffffffffffbbe119
>   kvm_exit:             reason EXIT_NPF rip 0xffffffffffbbe119 info
>     200000006 1ab000
>   kvm_nested_vmexit:    vcpu 0 reason npf rip 0xffffffffffbbe119 info1
>     0x0000000200000006 info2 0x00000000001ab000 intr_info 0x00000000
>     error_code 0x00000000
>   kvm_page_fault:       address 1ab000 error_code 6
>   kvm_nested_vmexit_inject: reason EXIT_NPF info1 200000006 info2 1ab000
>     int_info 0 int_info_err 0
>   kvm_entry:            vcpu 0, rip 0x7ffbb280
>   kvm_exit:             reason EXIT_EXCP_GP rip 0x7ffbb280 info 0 0
>   kvm_emulate_insn:     0:7ffbb280: 0f aa
>   kvm_inj_exception:    #GP (0x0)
> 
> Note: return to L2 succeeded but upon first exit to L1 its RIP points to
> 'RSM' instruction but we're not in SMM.
> 
> The problem appears to be that VMCB01 gets irreversibly destroyed during
> SMM execution. Previously, we used to have 'hsave' VMCB where regular
> (pre-SMM) L1's state was saved upon nested_svm_vmexit() but now we just
> switch to VMCB01 from VMCB02.
> 
> Pre-split (working) flow looked like:
> - SMM is triggered during L2's execution
> - L2's state is pushed to SMRAM
> - nested_svm_vmexit() restores L1's state from 'hsave'
> - SMM -> RSM
> - enter_svm_guest_mode() switches to L2 but keeps 'hsave' intact so we have
>   pre-SMM (and pre L2 VMRUN) L1's state there
> - L2's state is restored from SMRAM
> - upon first exit L1's state is restored from L1.
> 
> This was always broken with regards to svm_get_nested_state()/
> svm_set_nested_state(): 'hsave' was never a part of what's being
> save and restored so migration happening during SMM triggered from L2 would
> never restore L1's state correctly.
> 
> Post-split flow (broken) looks like:
> - SMM is triggered during L2's execution
> - L2's state is pushed to SMRAM
> - nested_svm_vmexit() switches to VMCB01 from VMCB02
> - SMM -> RSM
> - enter_svm_guest_mode() switches from VMCB01 to VMCB02 but pre-SMM VMCB01
>   is already lost.
> - L2's state is restored from SMRAM
> - upon first exit L1's state is restored from VMCB01 but it is corrupted
>  (reflects the state during 'RSM' execution).
> 
> VMX doesn't have this problem because unlike VMCB, VMCS keeps both guest
> and host state so when we switch back to VMCS02 L1's state is intact there.
> 
> To resolve the issue we need to save L1's state somewhere. We could've
> created a third VMCB for SMM but that would require us to modify saved
> state format. L1's architectural HSAVE area (pointed by MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA)
> seems appropriate: L0 is free to save any (or none) of L1's state there.
> Currently, KVM does 'none'.
> 
> Note, for nested state migration to succeed, both source and destination
> hypervisors must have the fix. We, however, don't need to create a new
> flag indicating the fact that HSAVE area is now populated as migration
> during SMM triggered from L2 was always broken.
> 
> Fixes: 4995a3685f1b ("KVM: SVM: Use a separate vmcb for the nested L2 guest")
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
> - RFC: I'm not 100% sure my 'smart' idea to use currently-unused HSAVE area
> is that smart. Also, we don't even seem to check that L1 set it up upon
> nested VMRUN so hypervisors which don't do that may remain broken. A very
> much needed selftest is also missing.
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index b6f85fd19f96..fbf1b352a9bb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -4291,6 +4291,7 @@ static int svm_smi_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
>  static int svm_enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *smstate)
>  {
>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +	struct kvm_host_map map_save;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
> @@ -4306,6 +4307,29 @@ static int svm_enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *smstate)
>  		ret = nested_svm_vmexit(svm);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * KVM uses VMCB01 to cache L1 host state while L2 runs but
> +		 * VMCB01 is going to be used during SMM and thus the state will
> +		 * be lost. Temporary save non-VMLOAD/VMSAVE state to host save
> +		 * area pointed to by MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA. APM guarantees that the
> +		 * format of the area is identical to guest save area offsetted
> +		 * by 0x400 (matches the offset of 'struct vmcb_save_area'
> +		 * within 'struct vmcb'). Note: HSAVE area may also be used by
> +		 * L1 hypervisor to save additional host context (e.g. KVM does
> +		 * that, see svm_prepare_guest_switch()) which must be
> +		 * preserved.
> +		 */

Minor nitpick: I woudn't say that KVM "caches" L1 host state as this implies
that there is a master copy somewhere.
I would write something like that instead:

"KVM stores L1 host state in VMCB01 because the CPU naturally stores it there."

Other than that the comment looks very good.



> +		if (kvm_vcpu_map(vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(svm->nested.hsave_msr),
> +				 &map_save) == -EINVAL)
> +			return 1;

Looks like the return value of vendor specific 'enter_smm' isn't checked
in the common 'enter_smm' handler which itself returns 'void', and doesn't
check anything it does either.

enter_smm is called from inject_pending_event which is allowed to return
a negative value which is assumed to be -EBUSY and doesn't lead
to exit with negative value to userspace.
I vote to fix this and only hide -EBUSY from the userspace,
and let all other errors from this function end up in userspace 
so that userspace could kill the guest.

This isn't this patch fault though, and I think I'll send a patch
to do the above.


> +
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct vmcb, save) != 0x400);
I doubt that this will ever change, but let it be.
> +
> +		svm_copy_nonvmloadsave_state(&svm->vmcb01.ptr->save,
> +					     map_save.hva + 0x400);
> +
> +		kvm_vcpu_unmap(vcpu, &map_save, true);
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -4313,7 +4337,7 @@ static int svm_enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *smstate)
>  static int svm_leave_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const char *smstate)
>  {
>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> -	struct kvm_host_map map;
> +	struct kvm_host_map map, map_save;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LM)) {
> @@ -4337,6 +4361,19 @@ static int svm_leave_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const char *smstate)
>  
>  			ret = enter_svm_guest_mode(vcpu, vmcb12_gpa, map.hva);
>  			kvm_vcpu_unmap(vcpu, &map, true);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Restore L1 host state from L1 HSAVE area as VMCB01 was
> +			 * used during SMM (see svm_enter_smm())
> +			 */
Looks fine as well.

> +			if (kvm_vcpu_map(vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(svm->nested.hsave_msr),
> +					 &map_save) == -EINVAL)
> +				return 1;
> +
> +			svm_copy_nonvmloadsave_state(map_save.hva + 0x400,
> +						     &svm->vmcb01.ptr->save);
> +
> +			kvm_vcpu_unmap(vcpu, &map_save, true);
>  		}
>  	}
>  

So besides the nitpick of the comment,
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-07 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-28 10:44 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: nSVM: Fix issues when SMM is entered from L2 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-28 10:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: nSVM: Check the value written to MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-07-07 10:28   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-08 17:27     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-09  6:08       ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-28 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: nSVM: Check that VM_HSAVE_PA MSR was set before VMRUN Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-07-07 10:28   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-28 10:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: nSVM: Introduce svm_copy_nonvmloadsave_state() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-07-05 12:08   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-07 10:29     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-28 10:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: nSVM: Fix L1 state corruption upon return from SMM Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-07-07 10:32   ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2021-06-28 10:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: nSVM: Restore nested control upon leaving SMM Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-07-07 10:35   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-28 10:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: selftests: smm_test: Test SMM enter from L2 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-07-07 10:35   ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-07-08 17:40 ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: nSVM: Fix issues when SMM is entered " Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=db569845400963d057eedf063bba1599cb9ed77a.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=cavery@redhat.com \
    --cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®