From: "Zhou, Libing (NSB - CN/Hangzhou)" <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>
To: "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "bp@suse.de" <bp@suse.de>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle duration miscalculation
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:02:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db5ea22c61ad4653a9c03a042cadee89@nokia-sbell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200820025641.44075-1-libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>
Hi,
Any comment on this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Libing Zhou <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>
Sent: 2020年8月20日 10:57
To: peterz@infradead.org; tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; bp@alien8.de; bp@suse.de; x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Zhou, Libing (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>; hpa@zytor.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle duration miscalculation
In nmi_check_duration(), the 'whole_msecs' value get from 'action->max_duration' is wrong.
Fixes: 248ed51048c4 ("x86/nmi: Remove irq_work from the long duration NMI handler")
Signed-off-by: Libing Zhou <libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>
---
v2:
Change solution as peterz@infradead.org suggested.
arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c index 4fc9954a9560..47381666d6a5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ fs_initcall(nmi_warning_debugfs);
static void nmi_check_duration(struct nmiaction *action, u64 duration) {
- u64 whole_msecs = READ_ONCE(action->max_duration);
int remainder_ns, decimal_msecs;
if (duration < nmi_longest_ns || duration < action->max_duration) @@ -110,12 +109,12 @@ static void nmi_check_duration(struct nmiaction *action, u64 duration)
action->max_duration = duration;
- remainder_ns = do_div(whole_msecs, (1000 * 1000));
+ remainder_ns = do_div(duration, (1000 * 1000));
decimal_msecs = remainder_ns / 1000;
printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO
"INFO: NMI handler (%ps) took too long to run: %lld.%03d msecs\n",
- action->handler, whole_msecs, decimal_msecs);
+ action->handler, duration, decimal_msecs);
}
static int nmi_handle(unsigned int type, struct pt_regs *regs)
--
2.22.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-31 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-20 2:56 Libing Zhou
2020-08-31 7:02 ` Zhou, Libing (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) [this message]
2020-10-01 12:46 ` [tip: x86/misc] x86/nmi: Fix nmi_handle() " tip-bot2 for Libing Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db5ea22c61ad4653a9c03a042cadee89@nokia-sbell.com \
--to=libing.zhou@nokia-sbell.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®