Re: [PATCH] watchdog: sc1200: Mark expected switch fall-through

["Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>]

On 2/18/19 10:08 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/14/19 12:20 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
>> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>
>> drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c: In function ‘sc1200wdt_ioctl’:
>> drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c:241:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>     sc1200wdt_write_data(WDTO, timeout);
>>     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c:244:2: note: here
>>    case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
>>    ^~~~
>>
>> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>>
>> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
>> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> 

Thank you, Guenter.


Friendly ping:

Who can take this?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

>> ---
>>   drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c
>> index 8e4e2fc13f87..e035a4d4b299 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c
>> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static long sc1200wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>               return -EINVAL;
>>           timeout = new_timeout;
>>           sc1200wdt_write_data(WDTO, timeout);
>> -        /* fall through and return the new timeout */
>> +        /* fall through - and return the new timeout */
>>         case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
>>           return put_user(timeout * 60, p);
>>
>