From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: Marius.Cristea@microchip.com, jic23@kernel.org,
nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org
Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
broonie@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adding support for PAC194X
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:22:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <db78ac20-9b58-49d1-ba38-cc269eaff254@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d364524bad53f5c665071287f55a96e28dc9b231.camel@microchip.com>
On 6/10/25 9:46 AM, Marius.Cristea@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thank you for the feedback. Please see my comments below...
>
...
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + maxItems: 2
>>> +
>>> + interrupt-names:
>>
>> Needs minItems: 1 if we want to allow a single named interrupt.
>>
> the driver as it is right now it doesn't support any interrupt. I was
> thinking to add them here, just in case there will be a request to be
> added later.
>
Making the bindings complete even if the driver isn't using it
yet is the right thing to do. :-)
I meant allowing just a single interrupt wired up though. So it
doesn't matter how the driver would handle it.
>
>>> + description:
>>> + alert1 indicates a HIGH or LOW limit was exceeded.
>>> + alert2 indicates a THERM limit was exceeded.
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: alert1
>>> + - const: alert2
>>> +
>>
...
>>> +
>>> + microchip,vbus-half-range:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>>> + description: |
>>> + In order to increase measurement resolution and keeping
>>> the same
>>> + number the of bits the device has a configurable VBUS
>>> full range scale
>>> + (FSR). The range should be set by hardware design and it
>>> should not be
>>> + changed during runtime. The bipolar capability for VBUS
>>> enables
>>> + accurate offset measurement and correction.
>>> + The VBUS could be configured into the following full
>>> scale range:
>>> + - VBUS has unipolar 0V to 32V FSR (default) for
>>> PAC195X or 0V to 9V
>>> + (default) for PAC194X.
>>> + - VBUS has bipolar -32V to 32V FSR for PAC195X or -9V
>>> to 9V for
>>> + PAC194X. The actual range is limited to about -200
>>> mV due to the
>>> + impact of the ESD structures.
>>> + - VBUS has bipolar -16V to 16V FSR for PAC195X or -
>>> 4.5V to 4.5V for
>>> + PAC194X. The actual range is limited to about -200
>>> mV due to the
>>> + impact of the ESD structures.
>>> +
>>> + microchip,vbus-bipolar:
>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>>> + description:
>>> + If provided, the channel is to be used in bipolar mode.
>>> The
>>> + actual range is limited to about -200 mV due to the
>>> impact of the ESD
>>> + structures.
>>> +
>>
>> Using Jonathan's suggestion from v2 to just have a single property
>> with 3 different
>> ranges to chose from seems simpler that this. It would only require
>> one property
>> and would be self-documenting. The description could be shortened to
>> just a couple
>> of lines.
>
> I was thinking to add the range for this property, but it looks (for me
> at least) more complicated from the checking point of view. The driver
> is supporting two family of devices that has, each, 3 different voltage
> range as an input.
>
Usually, having a consistent binding for the same thing among similar
devices is more important than how easy it is to implement in the driver.
Since this seems to be a common pattern, we could probably justify an
iio_property_match_ranges() helper function that would simplify the
implementation in drivers that would need to use such a property. Then
in each driver it would just be a matter of making a static const array
lookup table of ranges for each device and calling the helper function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 9:39 [PATCH v3 0/2] adding support for Microchip PAC194X Power Monitor marius.cristea
2025-06-06 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adding support for PAC194X marius.cristea
2025-06-06 15:53 ` David Lechner
2025-06-10 14:46 ` Marius.Cristea
2025-06-10 15:22 ` David Lechner [this message]
2025-06-10 16:04 ` Marius.Cristea
2025-06-10 16:35 ` David Lechner
2025-06-17 15:21 ` Marius.Cristea
2025-06-06 16:24 ` Conor Dooley
2025-06-06 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] " marius.cristea
2025-06-06 17:02 ` David Lechner
2025-06-10 15:07 ` Marius.Cristea
2025-06-10 16:11 ` David Lechner
2025-06-11 15:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-10 20:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-07 15:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-06-10 15:58 ` Marius.Cristea
2025-06-11 16:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=db78ac20-9b58-49d1-ba38-cc269eaff254@baylibre.com \
--to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=Marius.Cristea@microchip.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®