mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
	renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nick Forrington <nick.forrington@arm.com>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Sohom Datta <sohomdatta1@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update stall_slot workaround for N2 r0p3
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 14:44:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <db7d5375-b5b1-1fff-d612-73873ef2765c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a4ebdbc-c2c9-9f61-329f-8fd235f5f65c@oracle.com>



On 14/08/2023 14:02, John Garry wrote:
> 
>>     try:
>>       parsed = ast.parse(py, mode='eval')
>>     except SyntaxError as e:
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.c b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
>> index 7410a165f68b..0985a3cbc6f9 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>>   #include <util/expr-bison.h>
>>   #include <util/expr-flex.h>
>>   #include "util/hashmap.h"
>> +#include "util/header.h"
>> +#include "util/pmu.h"
>>   #include "smt.h"
>>   #include "tsc.h"
>>   #include <api/fs/fs.h>
>> @@ -495,3 +497,19 @@ double expr__has_event(const struct
>> expr_parse_ctx *ctx, bool compute_ids, const
>>       evlist__delete(tmp);
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>> +
>> +double expr__strcmp_cpuid_str(const struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx
>> __maybe_unused,
>> +               bool compute_ids __maybe_unused, const char *test_id)
>> +{
>> +    double ret;
>> +    struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
>> +    char *cpuid = perf_pmu__getcpuid(pmu);
>> +
>> +    if (!cpuid)
>> +        return NAN;
>> +
>> +    ret = !strcmp_cpuid_str(test_id, cpuid);
> 
> It seems that strcmp_cpuid_str() is only added in arm64 arch code -
> should there be a weak version for other archs?

I think there is one in tools/perf/util/header.c. I tested the build on
x86 as well as arm so it should be working.

> 
>> +
>> +    free(cpuid);
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.h b/tools/perf/util/expr.h
>> index 3c1e49b3e35d..c0cec29ddc29 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.h
>> @@ -55,5 +55,6 @@ double expr_id_data__value(const struct expr_id_data
>> *data);
>>   double expr_id_data__source_count(const struct expr_id_data *data);
>>   double expr__get_literal(const char *literal, const struct
>> expr_scanner_ctx *ctx);
>>   double expr__has_event(const struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx, bool
>> compute_ids, const char *id);
>> +double expr__strcmp_cpuid_str(const struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx, bool
>> compute_ids, const char *id);
>>     #endif
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.l b/tools/perf/util/expr.l
>> index dbb117414710..0feef0726c48 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.l
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.l
>> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ if        { return IF; }
>>   else        { return ELSE; }
>>   source_count    { return SOURCE_COUNT; }
>>   has_event    { return HAS_EVENT; }
>> +strcmp_cpuid_str    { return STRCMP_CPUID_STR; }
>>   {literal}    { return literal(yyscanner, sctx); }
>>   {number}    { return value(yyscanner); }
>>   {symbol}    { return str(yyscanner, ID, sctx->runtime); }
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.y b/tools/perf/util/expr.y
>> index 65d54a6f29ad..6c93b358cc2d 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/expr.y
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.y
>> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int expr_lex(YYSTYPE * yylval_param , void *yyscanner);
>>       } ids;
>>   }
>>   -%token ID NUMBER MIN MAX IF ELSE LITERAL D_RATIO SOURCE_COUNT
>> HAS_EVENT EXPR_ERROR
>> +%token ID NUMBER MIN MAX IF ELSE LITERAL D_RATIO SOURCE_COUNT
>> HAS_EVENT STRCMP_CPUID_STR EXPR_ERROR
>>   %left MIN MAX IF
>>   %left '|'
>>   %left '^'
>> @@ -207,6 +207,12 @@ expr: NUMBER
>>       $$.ids = NULL;
>>       free($3);
>>   }
>> +| STRCMP_CPUID_STR '(' ID ')'
>> +{
>> +    $$.val = expr__strcmp_cpuid_str(ctx, compute_ids, $3);
>> +    $$.ids = NULL;
>> +    free($3);
>> +}
>>   | expr '|' expr
>>   {
>>       if (is_const($1.val) && is_const($3.val)) {
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> index b6654b9f55d2..b6948021fe29 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> @@ -1779,3 +1779,20 @@ void perf_pmu__delete(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
>>       zfree(&pmu->alias_name);
>>       free(pmu);
>>   }
>> +
>> +struct perf_pmu *pmu__find_core_pmu(void)
> 
> Why was this relocated? I don't see anywhere changed which referenced
> pmu__find_core_pmu() in this patch
> 

It's in expr__strcmp_cpuid_str(), I added a new call to it.

>> +{
>> +    struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
>> +
>> +    while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu))) {
>> +        /*
>> +         * The cpumap should cover all CPUs. Otherwise, some CPUs may
>> +         * not support some events or have different event IDs.
>> +         */
>> +        if (RC_CHK_ACCESS(pmu->cpus)->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
>> +            return NULL;
>> +
>> +        return pmu;
>> +    }
>> +    return NULL;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.h b/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
>> index 203b92860e3c..580b8d65bd65 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
>> @@ -288,5 +288,6 @@ int perf_pmu__pathname_fd(int dirfd, const char
>> *pmu_name, const char *filename,
>>   struct perf_pmu *perf_pmu__lookup(struct list_head *pmus, int dirfd,
>> const char *lookup_name);
>>   struct perf_pmu *perf_pmu__create_placeholder_core_pmu(struct
>> list_head *core_pmus);
>>   void perf_pmu__delete(struct perf_pmu *pmu);
>> +struct perf_pmu *pmu__find_core_pmu(void);
>>     #endif /* __PMU_H */
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-14 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11 14:39 [PATCH v5 0/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update N2 and V2 metrics and events using Arm telemetry repo James Clark
2023-08-11 14:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] perf: cs-etm: Don't duplicate FIELD_GET() James Clark
2023-08-15 18:09   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-08-11 14:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] perf arm64: Allow version comparisons of CPU IDs James Clark
2023-08-14 13:07   ` John Garry
2023-08-14 14:15     ` James Clark
2023-08-14 14:43       ` John Garry
2023-08-16  9:02         ` James Clark
2023-08-15  9:35   ` John Garry
2023-08-16  9:12     ` James Clark
2023-08-16 10:15       ` John Garry
2023-08-11 14:39 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] perf test: Add a test for the new Arm CPU ID comparison behavior James Clark
2023-08-15  9:47   ` John Garry
2023-08-16  9:14     ` James Clark
2023-08-16 10:27       ` John Garry
2023-08-11 14:39 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update scale units and descriptions of common topdown metrics James Clark
2023-08-11 14:53   ` John Garry
2023-08-15 18:11     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-08-11 14:39 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update stall_slot workaround for N2 r0p3 James Clark
2023-08-14 13:02   ` John Garry
2023-08-14 13:44     ` James Clark [this message]
2023-08-15  9:40   ` John Garry
2023-08-16  9:16     ` James Clark
2023-08-11 14:39 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update N2 and V2 metrics and events using Arm telemetry repo James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=db7d5375-b5b1-1fff-d612-73873ef2765c@arm.com \
    --to=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.forrington@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sohomdatta1@gmail.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®