mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thorsten Blum <blum@kernel.org>
Cc: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kexec: Annotate umem_info members with __counted_by_ptr
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:42:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbb4580d-7e20-4c38-9716-f39cf81a4942@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <asDClaRrHuKB44X-@kernel.org>



On 03/10/26 14:23, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 11:49:04AM +0530, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>> On 30/07/26 18:32, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>>> Add __counted_by_ptr() to umem_info::buf and umem_info::ranges to
>>> improve access bounds checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS and
>>> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE.
>>>
>>> Set the count fields before assigning the corresponding pointers, return
>>> early on krealloc() failure, and use sizeof(*buf) when deriving
>>> max_entries from the allocation size.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>>>    1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c
>>> index 8c72e12ea44e..6424b668f0e9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c
>>> @@ -34,14 +34,15 @@
>>>    #include <asm/cputhreads.h>
>>>    struct umem_info {
>>> -	__be64 *buf;		/* data buffer for usable-memory property */
>>> +	/* data buffer for usable-memory property */
>>> +	__be64 *buf __counted_by_ptr(max_entries);
>>>    	u32 size;		/* size allocated for the data buffer */
>>>    	u32 max_entries;	/* maximum no. of entries */
>>>    	u32 idx;		/* index of current entry */
>>>    	/* usable memory ranges to look up */
>>>    	unsigned int nr_ranges;
>>> -	const struct range *ranges;
>>> +	const struct range *ranges __counted_by_ptr(nr_ranges);
>>>    };
>> [...]
>>>    const struct kexec_file_ops * const kexec_file_loaders[] = {
>>> @@ -83,11 +84,12 @@ static __be64 *check_realloc_usable_mem(struct umem_info *um_info, int cnt)
>>>    	new_size = um_info->size + MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ;
>>>    	tbuf = krealloc(um_info->buf, new_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> -	if (tbuf) {
>>> -		um_info->buf = tbuf;
>>> -		um_info->size = new_size;
>>> -		um_info->max_entries = (um_info->size / sizeof(u64));
>>> -	}
>>> +	if (!tbuf)
>>> +		return NULL;
>>> +
>>> +	um_info->size = new_size;
>>> +	um_info->max_entries = um_info->size / sizeof(*um_info->buf);
>>> +	um_info->buf = tbuf;
>>
>> Could you please explain why size and max_entries are updated before the
>> buffer itself?
> __counted_by_ptr() requires the counter ->max_entries to be set before
> the ->buf pointer is assigned; otherwise you have an inconsistent state
> where the counter doesn't match the pointer.

But isn't updating the counter holding the buffer size before the actual 
buffer
can cause problems?

Can you share the document link of __counted_by_ptr() which says that 
size counter to be
updated before the buffer pointer.

Here is an example in fs/coredump.c file where size counter is updated 
after the buffer
with __counter_by_ptr():

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/a90ee4305c4a5df72c11b31dacfdc76e00fcf78a/fs/coredump.c#L98
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/a90ee4305c4a5df72c11b31dacfdc76e00fcf78a/fs/coredump.c#L115

- Sourabh Jain

> And ->size is moved up because ->max_entries depends on it.



  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-30 13:02 Thorsten Blum
2026-09-25  6:19 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-10-03  8:53   ` Thorsten Blum
2026-10-05  8:12     ` Sourabh Jain [this message]
2026-10-05  8:26       ` Thorsten Blum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbb4580d-7e20-4c38-9716-f39cf81a4942@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=blum@kernel.org \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®