mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	sdf@fomichev.me, almasrymina@google.com, dw@davidwei.uk,
	michael.chan@broadcom.com, ap420073@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/24] Per queue configs and large rx buffer support for zcrx
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:46:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbd3784b-2704-4628-9e48-43b17b4980b1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ul2vfq7upoqwoyop7mhznjmsjau7e4ei2t643gx7t7egoez3vn@lhnf5h2dpeb5>

On 8/13/25 16:39, Dragos Tatulea wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 03:54:23PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> [...]
>> For example, for 200Gbit broadcom NIC, 4K vs 32K buffers, and napi and
>> userspace pinned to the same CPU:
>>
>> packets=23987040 (MB=2745098), rps=199559 (MB/s=22837)
>> CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft   %idle
>>    0    1.53    0.00   27.78    2.72    1.31   66.45    0.22
>> packets=24078368 (MB=2755550), rps=200319 (MB/s=22924)
>> CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft   %idle
>>    0    0.69    0.00    8.26   31.65    1.83   57.00    0.57
>>
>> And for napi and userspace on different CPUs:
>>
>> packets=10725082 (MB=1227388), rps=198285 (MB/s=22692)
>> CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft   %idle
>>    0    0.10    0.00    0.50    0.00    0.50   74.50    24.40
>>    1    4.51    0.00   44.33   47.22    2.08    1.85    0.00
>> packets=14026235 (MB=1605175), rps=198388 (MB/s=22703)
>> CPU    %usr   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft   %idle
>>    0    0.10    0.00    0.70    0.00    1.00   43.78   54.42
>>    1    1.09    0.00   31.95   62.91    1.42    2.63    0.00
>>
> What did you use for this benchmark, send-zerocopy? Could you share a
> branch and how you ran it please?
> 
> I have added some initial support to mlx5 for rx-buf-len and would like
> to benchmark it and compare it to what you posted.

You can use this branch:
https://github.com/isilence/liburing.git zcrx/rx-buf-len

# server
examples/zcrx -p <port> -q <queue_idx> -i <interface_name> -A1 \
              -B <rx_buf_len> -S <area size / memory provided>

"-A1" here is for using huge pages, so don't forget to configure
/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages.

# client
examples/send-zerocopy -6 tcp -D <ip addr> -p <port>
                        -t <runtime secs>
                        -l -b1 -n1 -z1 -d -s<send size>

I had to play with the client a bit for it to keep up with
the server. "-l" enables huge pages, and had to bump up the
send size. You can also add -v to both for a basic payload
verification.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-14 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-08 14:54 Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 01/24] net: page_pool: sanitise allocation order Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 02/24] docs: ethtool: document that rx_buf_len must control payload lengths Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 03/24] net: ethtool: report max value for rx-buf-len Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 04/24] net: use zero value to restore rx_buf_len to default Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 05/24] net: clarify the meaning of netdev_config members Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 06/24] net: add rx_buf_len to netdev config Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 07/24] eth: bnxt: read the page size from the adapter struct Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 08/24] eth: bnxt: set page pool page order based on rx_page_size Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 09/24] eth: bnxt: support setting size of agg buffers via ethtool Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 10/24] net: move netdev_config manipulation to dedicated helpers Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 11/24] net: reduce indent of struct netdev_queue_mgmt_ops members Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 12/24] net: allocate per-queue config structs and pass them thru the queue API Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 13/24] net: pass extack to netdev_rx_queue_restart() Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 14/24] net: add queue config validation callback Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 15/24] eth: bnxt: always set the queue mgmt ops Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 16/24] eth: bnxt: store the rx buf size per queue Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 17/24] eth: bnxt: adjust the fill level of agg queues with larger buffers Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 18:03   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-08-08 21:05     ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 18/24] netdev: add support for setting rx-buf-len per queue Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 19/24] net: wipe the setting of deactived queues Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 20/24] eth: bnxt: use queue op config validate Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 21/24] eth: bnxt: support per queue configuration of rx-buf-len Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 22/24] net: let pp memory provider to specify rx buf len Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 23/24] net: validate driver supports passed qcfg params Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-08 14:54 ` [RFC v2 24/24] io_uring/zcrx: implement large rx buffer support Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-13 15:39 ` [RFC v2 00/24] Per queue configs and large rx buffer support for zcrx Dragos Tatulea
2025-08-14 10:46   ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2025-08-15 16:44     ` Dragos Tatulea
2025-08-15 20:15       ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbd3784b-2704-4628-9e48-43b17b4980b1@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®