mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Jaeyeon Lee <jaeyeon.lee.dev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: hugetlb_madv_vs_map: fix TAP plan mismatches
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 12:40:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc44e71f-5f31-4b16-a28b-debc3e5d0f86@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004230018.190880-1-jaeyeon.lee.dev@gmail.com>

On 10/5/26 01:00, Jaeyeon Lee wrote:
> The plan was raised from 1 to 3, but the HugeTLB setup check that may
> call ksft_exit_skip() still runs after ksft_set_plan(), so a setup
> failure reports one result against a plan of 3. Move ksft_set_plan()
> below the setup check.
> 
> Also, when the underflow check fails, or munmap() fails,
> test_underflow() jumps to err_cleanup and exits without reporting the
> remaining results. Report the munmap() failure as a test result and
> skip the final HugePages_Rsvd check in err_cleanup, so the output
> always contains the planned 3 results.
> 
> Fixes: 827149aad495 ("selftests/mm: hugetlb_madv_vs_map: add underflow test")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Jaeyeon Lee <jaeyeon.lee.dev@gmail.com>
> ---

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers,

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <aqgUdbtumaO8RiIb@bender.morinfr.org>
2026-10-04 23:00 ` Jaeyeon Lee
2026-10-05 10:40   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-10-05 11:12   ` Sarthak Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc44e71f-5f31-4b16-a28b-debc3e5d0f86@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guillaume@morinfr.org \
    --cc=jaeyeon.lee.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®