From: Pratik Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, svaidy@linux.ibm.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
pratik.sampat@in.ibm.com, pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/powernv: Introduce Self save support
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:21:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc58e7b4-e07d-523a-f6f5-3e8c62eb48db@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200113075133.GD5419@oc0525413822.ibm.com>
I made a mistake while arranging the patches in the series. I'll re-arrange it
correctly now. Sorry about that.
On 13/01/20 1:21 pm, Ram Pai wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 09:15:08AM +0530, Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
>> This commit introduces and leverages the Self save API which OPAL now
>> supports.
>>
>> Add the new Self Save OPAL API call in the list of OPAL calls.
>> Implement the self saving of the SPRs based on the support populated
>> while respecting it's preferences.
>>
>> This implementation allows mixing of support for the SPRs, which
>> means that a SPR can be self restored while another SPR be self saved if
>> they support and prefer it to be so.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h | 3 ++-
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h | 1 +
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 2 ++
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-call.c | 1 +
>> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h
>> index c1f25a760eb1..1b6e1a68d431 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h
>> @@ -214,7 +214,8 @@
>> #define OPAL_SECVAR_GET 176
>> #define OPAL_SECVAR_GET_NEXT 177
>> #define OPAL_SECVAR_ENQUEUE_UPDATE 178
>> -#define OPAL_LAST 178
>> +#define OPAL_SLW_SELF_SAVE_REG 181
>> +#define OPAL_LAST 181
>>
>> #define QUIESCE_HOLD 1 /* Spin all calls at entry */
>> #define QUIESCE_REJECT 2 /* Fail all calls with OPAL_BUSY */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h
>> index 9986ac34b8e2..389a85b63805 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h
>> @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ int64_t opal_handle_hmi(void);
>> int64_t opal_handle_hmi2(__be64 *out_flags);
>> int64_t opal_register_dump_region(uint32_t id, uint64_t start, uint64_t end);
>> int64_t opal_unregister_dump_region(uint32_t id);
>> +int64_t opal_slw_self_save_reg(uint64_t cpu_pir, uint64_t sprn);
>> int64_t opal_slw_set_reg(uint64_t cpu_pir, uint64_t sprn, uint64_t val);
>> int64_t opal_config_cpu_idle_state(uint64_t state, uint64_t flag);
>> int64_t opal_pci_set_phb_cxl_mode(uint64_t phb_id, uint64_t mode, uint64_t pe_number);
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
>> index 2f328403b0dc..d67d4d0b169b 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
>> @@ -1172,6 +1172,8 @@ void pnv_program_cpu_hotplug_lpcr(unsigned int cpu, u64 lpcr_val)
>> if (!is_lpcr_self_save)
>> opal_slw_set_reg(pir, SPRN_LPCR,
>> lpcr_val);
>> + else
>> + opal_slw_self_save_reg(pir, SPRN_LPCR);
> opal_slw_self_save_reg() was used in the prior patch too. How did it
> compile, if the definition is in this patch?
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
>
> RP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-13 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-13 3:45 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce Self-Save API for deep stop states Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2020-01-13 3:45 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc/powernv: Interface to define support and preference for a SPR Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2020-01-13 7:44 ` Ram Pai
2020-01-13 9:49 ` Pratik Sampat
2020-01-13 3:45 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/powernv: Introduce Self save support Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2020-01-13 7:51 ` Ram Pai
2020-01-13 9:51 ` Pratik Sampat [this message]
2020-01-13 3:45 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc/powernv: Parse device tree, population of SPR support Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2020-01-13 7:55 ` Ram Pai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc58e7b4-e07d-523a-f6f5-3e8c62eb48db@linux.ibm.com \
--to=psampat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com \
--cc=pratik.sampat@in.ibm.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®