mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4-rc1 BUILD FIX] s390: mark __cpacf_query() as __always_inline
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 08:44:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc7f77bd-18d4-5f0e-6749-b00b23647f53@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1910012203010.13160@cbobk.fhfr.pm>


On 01.10.19 22:08, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c calls on several places __cpacf_query() directly, 
> which makes it impossible to meet the "i" constraint for the asm operands 
> (opcode in this case).
> 
> As we are now force-enabling CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING on all 
> architectures, this causes a build failure on s390:
> 
>    In file included from arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:44:
>    ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h: In function '__cpacf_query':
>    ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:179:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints
>      179 |  asm volatile(
>          |  ^~~
>    ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:179:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'
> 
> Mark __cpacf_query() as __always_inline in order to fix that, analogically 
> how we fixes __cpacf_check_opcode(), cpacf_query_func() and scpacf_query() 
> already.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
> Fixes: d83623c5eab2 ("s390: mark __cpacf_check_opcode() and cpacf_query_func() as __always_inline")
> Fixes: e60fb8bf68d4 ("s390/cpacf: mark scpacf_query() as __always_inline")
> Fixes: ac7c3e4ff401 ("compiler: enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING forcibly")
> Fixes: 9012d011660e ("compiler: allow all arches to enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING")
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Thanks applied. 


> 
> I am wondering how is it possible that none of the build-testing 
> infrastructure we have running against linux-next caught this? Not enough 
> non-x86 coverage?

We do build-test linux-next daily. Maybe our compiler just made a different
inlining decision.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-02  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-01 20:08 Jiri Kosina
2019-10-01 20:15 ` Jiri Kosina
2019-10-02  6:44 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2019-10-02  6:46 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-10-02  6:49   ` Heiko Carstens
2019-10-02  7:03   ` Michal Kubecek
2019-10-02  8:21     ` Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc7f77bd-18d4-5f0e-6749-b00b23647f53@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®