From: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: kernel@openvz.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] nfs v2/3: nlmclnt_lock: handle async processing of F_SETLK with FL_SLEEP
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:24:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc99ce3c-d73f-b21b-b92f-d0b1025c4567@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f354cec-d2d6-ddf5-56e0-325c10fe26ee@virtuozzo.com>
nfsd and lockd use F_SETLK cmd with the FL_SLEEP flag set to request
asynchronous processing of blocking locks.
Currently nfs v2/3 handles such requests by using nlmclnt_lock() ->
do_vfs_lock() -> locks_lock_inode_wait() function which is blocked
if request have FL_SLEEP flag set.
To handle them correctly FL_SLEEP flag should be temporarily reset
before executing the locks_lock_inode_wait() function.
Additionally block flag is forced to set, to translate blocking lock to
remote nfs server, expecting it supports async processing of the blocking
locks too.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215383
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
---
fs/lockd/clntproc.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
index 99fffc9cb958..5941aa7c9cc9 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
@@ -519,11 +519,18 @@ nlmclnt_lock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
unsigned char fl_flags = fl->fl_flags;
unsigned char fl_type;
int status = -ENOLCK;
+ bool async = false;
if (nsm_monitor(host) < 0)
goto out;
req->a_args.state = nsm_local_state;
+ async = !req->a_args.block &&
+ ((fl_flags & FL_SLEEP_POSIX) == FL_SLEEP_POSIX);
+ if (async) {
+ fl->fl_flags &= ~FL_SLEEP;
+ req->a_args.block = 1;
+ }
fl->fl_flags |= FL_ACCESS;
status = do_vfs_lock(fl);
fl->fl_flags = fl_flags;
@@ -573,8 +580,11 @@ nlmclnt_lock(struct nlm_rqst *req, struct file_lock *fl)
up_read(&host->h_rwsem);
goto again;
}
- /* Ensure the resulting lock will get added to granted list */
- fl->fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
+ if (async)
+ fl->fl_flags &= ~FL_SLEEP;
+ else
+ /* Ensure the resulting lock will get added to granted list */
+ fl->fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
if (do_vfs_lock(fl) < 0)
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: VFS is out of sync with lock manager!\n", __func__);
up_read(&host->h_rwsem);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-29 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-27 10:45 [PATCH] nfs4: " Vasily Averin
2021-12-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Vasily Averin
2021-12-28 1:04 ` Vasily Averin
2021-12-29 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] nfs: local_lock: " Vasily Averin
2021-12-29 8:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nfs4: " Vasily Averin
2022-01-03 19:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-01-16 12:25 ` Vasily Averin
2022-01-03 19:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2022-01-16 12:44 ` Vasily Averin
2022-01-16 18:28 ` Vasily Averin
2022-01-18 22:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-12-29 8:24 ` Vasily Averin [this message]
2021-12-27 17:58 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
2022-01-06 10:37 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc99ce3c-d73f-b21b-b92f-d0b1025c4567@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®