From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C352C433EF for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 12:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242409AbiEPMdx (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2022 08:33:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52752 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230463AbiEPMdu (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2022 08:33:50 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com (lelv0143.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.248]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38662765C; Mon, 16 May 2022 05:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 24GCXfAJ080648; Mon, 16 May 2022 07:33:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1652704421; bh=wEfiB77l8dJw5p0Gse74BRbiQ655k1247reOtA2vKZE=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=W4EzJN9eWEzZoqoEiVDTSWCM/CMoBG7aEhqv/n9xrOCj3QotADBK31zDNzzrXFajI z1INLpHzjuFXNLKAGkQIxZ/Bn06lLVNmhyAf5G7HeJEtoW9lLYGULsKJz+rFOIz4AA yUiEpccsxtKuHzbSIWiDjDwVVWdvZKOTWr67QI6A= Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (dfle103.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.24]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 24GCXfvQ119051 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 16 May 2022 07:33:41 -0500 Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Mon, 16 May 2022 07:33:41 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 16 May 2022 07:33:41 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.159] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 24GCXcFw051830; Mon, 16 May 2022 07:33:38 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 18:03:37 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: ti: pruss: Update bindings for K3 AM62x SoCs Content-Language: en-US To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Nishanth Menon CC: Santosh Shilimkar , , , , Vignesh Raghavendra References: <20220427072703.4898-1-kishon@ti.com> <20220427072703.4898-2-kishon@ti.com> <53212a3b-d02c-ab5e-6b5c-e19d359c7c2b@linaro.org> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I In-Reply-To: <53212a3b-d02c-ab5e-6b5c-e19d359c7c2b@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Krzysztof, On 28/04/22 11:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 27/04/2022 09:27, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Update the PRUSS bindings for the PRUSSM instance present in >> AM625 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml >> index 64461d432004..cf13e5179657 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml >> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ properties: >> - ti,am654-icssg # for K3 AM65x SoC family >> - ti,j721e-icssg # for K3 J721E SoC family >> - ti,am642-icssg # for K3 AM64x SoC family >> + - ti,am625-pruss # for K3 AM62x SoC family >> > > Looks like out of order (although for some reason before it was also > misordered...). These are really in the chronological order of the introduction of SoCs. Isn't that okay to have? Thanks, Kishon